Trump says he will roll back fuel efficiency standards for vehicles

President Trump has announced plans to "reset" fuel efficiency standards for passenger cars in an effort to curb rising auto prices, which have been a major concern for consumers amid the ongoing inflation crisis. The new rules aim to "save the American people $109 billion" or approximately $1,000 on the average cost of a new vehicle.

However, environmental groups and some industry experts are questioning the wisdom of rolling back fuel efficiency standards, which were implemented to reduce carbon emissions. The updated targets for model year 2031 vehicles will be lower than those set by the Biden administration, sparking concerns about how this will impact automakers' long-term strategy and product development plans.

The move has been met with support from Detroit's "Big Three" car companies - Stellantis, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors. The executives praise the new rules as a way to re-align standards with real-world market conditions while giving customers more choice and affordability.

Industry analysts note that the changes will have little impact on prices near-term but may change automaker long-term strategy. The Department of Transportation has also emphasized that reviving American manufacturing and unshackling the nation's automotive industry are key objectives behind the proposal.

The White House has defended the move, stating that it is necessary to put a lid on rising auto prices. Food prices have been rising this year, with overall inflation increasing every month since Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imported goods. The new fuel efficiency standards will also classify crossover vehicles and small SUVs as passenger automobiles instead of light trucks, removing what was seen as a "market distortion" that existed for decades.

The proposal has sparked both praise and criticism, with some experts warning about the potential consequences of rolling back fuel efficiency standards. Despite this, shares of Ford and GM stock closed higher on Wednesday following the announcement, while Stellantis' stock surged 4.7%.
 
omg i'm so down for a good format debate πŸ€”πŸ’» the new fuel efficiency rules are gonna be all about layout, like who gets to decide what's a passenger car and what's not πŸš—πŸ‘€ and how is that even quantifiable? $1,000 on average savings sounds suspiciously like a marketing gimmick πŸ’Έ meanwhile environmental groups should be like " hold up let's get the bigger picture here" 🌎
 
Ugh, great, just what we need, more ways to screw over our planet 🌎. So, Trump is trying to save us $109 billion by letting car manufacturers slap less efficient engines in their vehicles and call it a day? Like, no thanks πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. And now the Big Three are just going to go ahead and produce more gas-guzzlers because that's what the market wants, right? It's not like we need to be worried about climate change or anything... πŸ™„. I mean, who needs electric cars when you can have a fancy new SUV that'll get 20 miles per gallon on the highway? πŸ˜‚ Can't wait to see how this all plays out and how much our wallets (and the planet) will take for it πŸ‘Ž.
 
I'm getting old 😊... remember when we were worried about gas prices? Now it's all about inflation and auto prices πŸš—πŸ’Έ. I don't get why they're trying to "reset" fuel efficiency standards again, it seems like a step backward to me πŸ€”. We used to have those crazy low emissions standards back in the 90s, but they were more of a hassle for car owners than anything else πŸ˜…. What's next? Are we gonna go back to driving V8s and big trucks too? 🚚 I'm all for affordable cars, but at what cost? The environment, right? 🌎
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda surprised by Trump's move πŸ€”. On one hand, $109 billion is a serious chunk of change, but on the other hand, how is that gonna help with carbon emissions? 🌎 It just seems like another way to make cars cheaper for consumers while putting more strain on the environment. I mean, what about the long-term effects? Is it really worth it if we're gonna have to pay the price later? πŸ€‘ I'm also a bit curious to see how this is gonna play out with automakers and their product development plans... will they just roll with it or do something else entirely? πŸ€”
 
I'm kinda with Trump on this one πŸ€‘. I get that inflation is killing people's wallets and all, but I don't think rolling back fuel efficiency standards is gonna hurt us that much in the long run. I mean, those cars are already getting pretty efficient, right? πŸš—πŸ’¨ And if consumers start to expect cheaper rides without sacrificing too much comfort, it could actually create some healthy competition among automakers.

I also appreciate the fact that these changes aim to give customers more choice and affordability. If we're gonna be stuck with lower fuel efficiency standards, at least let's make sure we're getting the best cars for our buck πŸ’Έ. And who knows, maybe this will lead to new innovations in the industry πŸ€”?
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda torn about this one... On one hand, saving people $1k is a nice bonus πŸ€‘ but what about all the environmental benefits we were supposed to get from those fuel efficiency standards? It's like, yeah, we can have cheaper cars now but at what cost to the planet? 🌎 I know automakers want to make more money and stuff but shouldn't we be prioritizing our future for the next gen? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ This is one of those decisions that'll keep me up at night 😴...
 
πŸš—πŸ’Έ I just don't think it's a good idea to roll back fuel efficiency standards right now... we're already feeling the effects of inflation 🀯 and rising prices are super frustrating for everyone. If we can reduce carbon emissions while also making cars more affordable, that sounds like a win-win to me 😊. But if it's gonna cost $1,000 extra on the average new vehicle price, I'm not sure it's worth it πŸ’Έ. What do you guys think? Should we be prioritizing affordability or environmental concerns? πŸ€”
 
I'm all for making cars more affordable for the average person πŸ€‘ but I've gotta wonder if reducing fuel efficiency standards is really gonna save us that kinda cash πŸ’Έ $109 billion seems like a pretty big claim to me πŸ€” especially when you consider how many jobs and industries will be affected by these changes πŸš—. And what about all those people who rely on electric/hybrid vehicles for their daily commute? 🌐 Are we just gonna push them towards more gas-guzzling options? 🚫
 
omg i'm literally dying over here!! 😍 president trump is doing it!!! he's going to save us $109 billion πŸ’Έ and make cars more affordable πŸ’– like, what's not to love?! 🀩 the big three car companies are super stoked about this too πŸ™Œ and i totally get why they'd be - who doesn't want lower prices and more choice?! πŸŽ‰ but i'm a little worried that it might impact our planet 🌎 in the long run tho... πŸ€” i mean, fuel efficiency standards were put in place to reduce carbon emissions and all that jazz πŸ’š so we'll just have to see how this plays out 🀞
 
Umm... I'm kinda thinkin' that maybe we should just stick with the original fuel efficiency standards? Like, don't get me wrong, saving $109 billion sounds awesome and all πŸ€‘ but do we really want to sacrifice our planet's health for it? On the other hand, if these new rules are gonna save us some serious cash on our cars... I mean, who doesn't love a good deal? πŸ˜‚ But then again, what if this is just a bunch of corporate BS and they're just trying to line their pockets with more money? πŸ€‘ I'm so confused now 🀯
 
I'm just imagining what $1k in savings does for your avocado toast budget lol πŸ˜‚. But seriously, folks, it's like, why mess with a good thing? Those fuel efficiency standards have been doing their job for years, and now they're getting axed πŸ€”. I mean, sure, the Big Three car companies are happy about it, but what about all those environmental groups who just want to save the planet 🌎? It's like, can't we just find a balance between saving money and saving the planet at the same time? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
idk about this new rule πŸ€”... on one hand, it's good for consumers that they'll be saving some cash πŸ’Έ on their new ride. but on the other hand, environmental groups are right to question whether we're sacrificing too much in terms of reducing carbon emissions 🌎. i mean, $109 billion is a big chunk of change... and what if this just pushes the problem to the future instead of solving it now? 🀯 i'm kinda glad the big 3 are on board with it tho... maybe they know something we don't 😊. but for real tho, let's be cautious here...
 
OMG, u guyz!!! 🀯 I think its kinda crazy that they wanna roll back fuel efficiency standards lol... idk about savin us $109 billion tho πŸ€‘ we should be thinkin bout the planet 1st, right? 🌎 those new rules r def gonna impact automakers long-term strategy and stuff πŸ”„ like how r they gonna make cars more affordable if they dont have to meet certain emissions targets? πŸ€” and whats up with the new classification thingy? πŸ“ it seems illogical to me... I hope they reconsider this decision 🀞
 
so imo it's all about the money πŸ€‘ - trump is trying to save us $109 billion but at what cost? like, we all know that 's just a bunch of numbers but what about the actual impact on our planet? 🌎 i mean, those fuel efficiency standards were put in place for a reason and now they're getting rolled back. it's scary because who knows what other environmental damage is gonna happen if this gets through.

and let's not forget about those 'big three' car companies - stellantis, ford, and gm πŸš—πŸ’Έ. they're loving this new proposal but i'm not sure i trust their motives. are they really looking out for us consumers or just trying to line their pockets? πŸ€‘ it's all about the benjamins, am i right?

anyway, i do think there's some merit to the idea of revising fuel efficiency standards - inflation is a real concern and we need to find ways to make cars more affordable πŸ€”. but this has got to be done in a way that doesn't compromise our values or the health of our planet πŸ’š. it's all about finding that sweet spot, you know? βš–οΈ
 
I'm all for giving Americans a break on new car prices, but are we prioritizing short-term gains over long-term sustainability? πŸ€” I mean, $109 billion is a lot of money, but what about the environmental cost of rolling back fuel efficiency standards? We need to be careful not to sacrifice our commitment to reducing carbon emissions. The fact that Big Three execs are supporting this move doesn't necessarily mean it's in the best interest of consumers... or the planet 🌎. What if automakers just use this as an excuse to skimp on more eco-friendly tech? We need some real transparency and accountability here πŸ‘€.
 
OMG 🀯 I'm totally confused by these new fuel efficiency standards πŸš—πŸ’¨! Like, I get that Trump wants to save people money πŸ’Έ but is it really worth sacrificing our planet's future for the sake of cheaper cars? 🌎 I mean, $109 billion might not seem like a lot but it adds up, you know? πŸ€” Plus, what about all those crossover vehicles and SUVs? πŸš—πŸ’₯ Are we just gonna classify them as passenger cars now? πŸ˜‚ It's all so... confusing! πŸ˜… I've been following this story and I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. Can someone please explain the plan to me in a super simple way, like, step by step? πŸ€“
 
πŸ€” I think it's a bit concerning that they're trying to save $109 billion by lowering fuel efficiency standards. While I get the argument about consumers being hit hard by inflation and rising auto prices, we can't just roll back on something as critical as reducing carbon emissions πŸš—πŸ’¨. The fact that environmental groups are speaking out against this move suggests there's some validity to their concerns. Can't we find a middle ground here? Maybe implement more targeted measures that still help consumers while also taking a closer look at the long-term impact on the environment? πŸŒŽπŸ’‘
 
the auto industry is a perfect example of the fox guarding the henhouse πŸ“πŸš—... just think about it, the government is always looking out for "American people" but who's actually benefitting from this deal? automakers are basically getting away with breaking some rules that were put in place to protect the planet... and all they're doing is passing the cost on to consumers πŸ€‘πŸ“‰
 
Back
Top