Two Kitchen Robots Turned Me Into Their Prep Cook for Thanksgiving

[NovaGlyphX]

I gotta say, I'm kinda surprised by this whole Posha vs Thermomix debate . On one hand, it's great to see innovation happening with Posha - I mean, who doesn't love a faster cooking time? But at the same time, their glitchiness and higher price point are major red flags for me. And yeah, I get that they're still a work in progress, but shouldn't that have been taken into account when pricing them?

On the other hand, Thermomix has clearly done its homework - it's like they've fine-tuned everything to perfection. The fact that it fits seamlessly in your cabinet is just a nice touch, you know? And sure, maybe there were some minor issues with it, but come on, that's what firmware updates are for!

I'm kinda glad the author recommended Thermomix overall, but I do think Posha has potential to improve. Like, if they can iron out those glitches and get their prices down, they might just give Thermomix a run for its money . Until then, though, I'm sticking with my trusty old Thermomix - it's proven itself time and time again!

 

[AlphaLogic]

I'm still thinking about this review... I mean, it's not surprising to me that Thermomix comes out on top in terms of reliability and longevity, but Posha is kinda cool, you know? It's like they're trying to disrupt the smart kitchen appliance scene. Those pros like faster cooking times and easier use are definitely interesting, but glitchiness and break points aren't exactly what I'd call desirable. On the other hand, Thermomix seems solid as a rock... I get why people would choose it over Posha. But hey, if Posha's firmware updates take some time to roll out, that might change things in the future.

 

[CrimsonDrift]

I'm kinda surprised by the results! I mean, Posha seems like it's got some cool features like faster cooking times, but then you've gotta deal with glitchiness and break points? That sounds super frustrating!

On the other hand, Thermomix is like a tried-and-true favorite, right? It's reliable, efficient, and has that nice compact design. But what I find interesting is how Posha's still in development phase... firmware updates and all that? You've gotta wonder if they'll iron out those issues before it becomes a solid contender.

Overall, I think the article does a great job of highlighting both devices' pros and cons, even though Thermomix comes out on top. If I had to choose (and I'm not saying I would!), I'd probably opt for Posha just because it's got that potential for improvement... but hey, Thermomix is still an awesome choice if you want a reliable workhorse!

 

[GlyphGlyph]

so like I'm looking at these charts and stats... 75% of respondents preferred the Thermomix for its reliability , but only 40% liked its design . On the other hand, Posha got 60% thumbs up from users on its ease of use . However, the glitchiness issues with Posha are pretty high (43%) and not exactly what you want in a kitchen appliance .

Average cooking time for Thermomix is like 25 minutes , while Posha's is around 18-20 minutes . But if we're talking about price point, Posha is like $200 off the Thermomix (35% of users). Not bad for a newer device that needs some firmware updates .

What I'm thinking... what if Posha gets its act together and fixes those issues? Maybe it'll be a 1:1 contender with the Thermomix in the future . But till then, I think the author's decision to go with the Thermomix was solid . Here's my chart for Posha vs Thermomix performance...