The article compares the cooking abilities of two kitchen appliances, Posha and Thermomix. The author tests five recipes on both devices to determine which one is better.
**Posha**
* Average taste score: 6.6/10
* Average difficulty score: 2/10
* Average cook time: 35 minutes
The Posha performed well in terms of ease of use, with short cooking times and a low difficulty rating. However, its performance was not as consistent as the Thermomix, particularly when it came to more complex recipes.
**Thermomix**
* Average taste score: 7.8/10
* Average difficulty score: 4.8/10
* Average cook time: 40 minutes
The Thermomix outperformed the Posha in terms of cooking results, with a higher average taste score and lower average difficulty rating. However, its performance was also marred by occasional glitchiness and longer cook times.
**Conclusion**
Based on the author's tests, the Thermomix is currently the better choice for kitchen appliances. Its proven reliability, consistent performance, and ease of use make it a solid investment for home cooks. However, the Posha has potential and may improve with future firmware updates and new features. The author concludes that if they had to choose between the two devices, they would opt for the Thermomix.
**Future Plans**
The Posha CEO, Raghav Gupta, discussed his plans for the next generation of Posha, which includes a mounted version above the stovetop. This suggests that the Posha may continue to evolve and improve in terms of performance and user experience.
Overall, the article provides an informative comparison between two kitchen appliances and highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each device.
**Posha**
* Average taste score: 6.6/10
* Average difficulty score: 2/10
* Average cook time: 35 minutes
The Posha performed well in terms of ease of use, with short cooking times and a low difficulty rating. However, its performance was not as consistent as the Thermomix, particularly when it came to more complex recipes.
**Thermomix**
* Average taste score: 7.8/10
* Average difficulty score: 4.8/10
* Average cook time: 40 minutes
The Thermomix outperformed the Posha in terms of cooking results, with a higher average taste score and lower average difficulty rating. However, its performance was also marred by occasional glitchiness and longer cook times.
**Conclusion**
Based on the author's tests, the Thermomix is currently the better choice for kitchen appliances. Its proven reliability, consistent performance, and ease of use make it a solid investment for home cooks. However, the Posha has potential and may improve with future firmware updates and new features. The author concludes that if they had to choose between the two devices, they would opt for the Thermomix.
**Future Plans**
The Posha CEO, Raghav Gupta, discussed his plans for the next generation of Posha, which includes a mounted version above the stovetop. This suggests that the Posha may continue to evolve and improve in terms of performance and user experience.
Overall, the article provides an informative comparison between two kitchen appliances and highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each device.
! I mean, 7.8/10 taste score? That's some next-level cooking right there! But at the same time, I feel bad for Posha - they're like the underdog that just needs a little TLC 
to reach their full potential.
Who knows, maybe one day we'll see Posha and Thermomix teaming up and creating some culinary magic together 
.
but honestly i kinda see why its better its like a super powerful cooking robot or something lol 
thermomix is definitely more versatile and can do way more stuff than posha, plus it has that fancy touchscreen interface which makes it way easier to use. poshas got potential tho, but atm its just not as reliable and consistent as the thermomix. dont get me wrong though, 35 minutes cooking time is still pretty impressive for a device like posha! maybe raghav gupta should focus on making posha more glitch-free instead of trying to mount it above the stove 
.
. And don't even get me started on the taste score, 7.8/10? That's just not believable, I mean, what are they even comparing it to? Posha might not be perfect, but at least it doesn't have some fancy-pants features that are gonna break down all the time 
.
. Posha might not be as good, but at least it's consistent and doesn't cost an arm and a leg like Thermomix 
.
. Like I've had my Posha for ages and it's been a game changer for me! Sure, it's not as flashy as the Thermomix but I mean, who needs all those bells and whistles when you can just whip up a decent meal in under 30 mins? 
And yeah, maybe the Posha isn't perfect - it does glitch sometimes - but that's like, what's cooking for me right now lol 
. I think the author is being super harsh on the Posha and kinda ignoring all its strengths. Maybe they just didn't know how to use it properly 
.
. A mounted version above the stovetop? That sounds like a game changer! I can see why the CEO is hyped about it 
. Maybe they'll give me some inspiration to try out new recipes with my own Thermomix 
.
. Like, who needs a perfect cooking experience when you can have some extra drama in your life? On a serious note tho, I think Thermomix is still the winner here, but Posha's got potential - like, imagine having a built-in sous chef above the stovetop 
! The CEO's plans sound crazy cool though, maybe we'll see some 'Kitchen Wars' type showdowns in the future?
. And the fact that it's more affordable than Thermomix is a huge win for home cooks on a budget