Families of Victims Killed in US Airstrike Sue the Nation
The families of two men, Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo, who were killed in a US airstrike off the coast of Trinidad have filed a lawsuit against the United States government. The strike occurred on October 14th, while the victims were returning to Venezuela with four other men.
According to the lawsuit, the US government's actions are "unlawful" and demonstrate "clear disregard for human life." Attorney Jonathan Hafetz, representing the families in Massachusetts federal district court, described the airstrike as an "unprecedented abuse of power." The lawsuit argues that the Trump administration's justification for the strike - that the men were involved in a conflict against narco-terrorists - is "flawed" and unsupported by evidence.
The US government has claimed that the targets of the strikes are combatants in this armed conflict, but it appears that the boat carrying Joseph and Samaroo was not specifically identified as being involved in any such activity. The lawsuit seeks compensation for the wrongful deaths of Joseph and Samaroo, as well as damages for their families.
Since President Trump's first authorized airstrike on September 2nd, at least 126 people have been killed in the Caribbean operations. Human rights advocates argue that these strikes are a clear violation of international law and represent a significant escalation of executive power.
"We're talking about uncharted water here," said Hafetz. "The US is essentially claiming the right to kill anyone it deems a threat, without any checks or balances."
The families of two men, Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo, who were killed in a US airstrike off the coast of Trinidad have filed a lawsuit against the United States government. The strike occurred on October 14th, while the victims were returning to Venezuela with four other men.
According to the lawsuit, the US government's actions are "unlawful" and demonstrate "clear disregard for human life." Attorney Jonathan Hafetz, representing the families in Massachusetts federal district court, described the airstrike as an "unprecedented abuse of power." The lawsuit argues that the Trump administration's justification for the strike - that the men were involved in a conflict against narco-terrorists - is "flawed" and unsupported by evidence.
The US government has claimed that the targets of the strikes are combatants in this armed conflict, but it appears that the boat carrying Joseph and Samaroo was not specifically identified as being involved in any such activity. The lawsuit seeks compensation for the wrongful deaths of Joseph and Samaroo, as well as damages for their families.
Since President Trump's first authorized airstrike on September 2nd, at least 126 people have been killed in the Caribbean operations. Human rights advocates argue that these strikes are a clear violation of international law and represent a significant escalation of executive power.
"We're talking about uncharted water here," said Hafetz. "The US is essentially claiming the right to kill anyone it deems a threat, without any checks or balances."