UAE to Fund First "Planned Community" in South Gaza Under Controversial Conditions
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has announced plans to fund the construction of "Gaza's first planned community", located on the outskirts of Rafah, the southernmost city in Gaza. The project, which is the UAE's first investment in a post-war reconstruction project in the part of Gaza currently under Israeli control, will provide basic services such as education, healthcare, and running water to Palestinian residents, but with several conditions.
Residents of the planned community will be required to submit to biometric data collection and security vetting before being allowed access. This has raised concerns among human rights groups, who argue that such measures amount to "coercive surveillance" and are part of a broader effort to control and oppress Palestinians in Gaza.
The plan also does not specify who would conduct security checks at the entry and exit points of the community, nor do they articulate why someone would be turned away. This lack of transparency has sparked fears that the project could become a tool for Israel to exert control over Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip.
Critics argue that such measures are part of a broader effort by Israel to implement its own vision for Gaza, which involves the creation of "model Palestinian communities" that can be used as a way to displace and oppress Palestinians. The project has been described as a "desirable outcome" for Israel, highlighting the need for increased scrutiny and oversight of such initiatives.
The UAE's involvement in the project has also raised questions about its motivations and the level of control it will exert over the reconstruction efforts in Gaza. The country's contribution to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is already significant, with over $1.8 billion in aid since October 2023.
As part of the US-led Board of Peace plan, which aims to rebuild and revitalize Gaza, Israel will not participate in building or running the Emirati compound, but instead will focus on clearing infrastructure and debris from the area. This has sparked concerns that the project could be used as a pretext for further Israeli control over Palestinians living in Gaza.
The reconstruction efforts in Gaza are expected to take up to 80 years to complete, with an estimated cost of at least $70 billion. The project is already facing numerous challenges, including the need for land-clearing efforts and the retrieval of bodies trapped under the rubble.
The planned community is a key part of the US-led Board of Peace's vision for Gaza, which envisions the creation of eight "residential areas" spanning the entire Mediterranean coast. However, critics argue that this plan ignores the complexities of the situation on the ground and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the reconstruction efforts.
The EU has already expressed concerns about the project, with a visiting Middle East fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations stating that "reconstruction planners at the CMCC seem to be operating under the assumption that Palestinians will leave the Hamas-controlled red zone and move into newly constructed communities if you dump enough food there". This concern highlights the need for increased scrutiny of such initiatives and the importance of prioritizing the needs and rights of Palestinian communities in Gaza.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has announced plans to fund the construction of "Gaza's first planned community", located on the outskirts of Rafah, the southernmost city in Gaza. The project, which is the UAE's first investment in a post-war reconstruction project in the part of Gaza currently under Israeli control, will provide basic services such as education, healthcare, and running water to Palestinian residents, but with several conditions.
Residents of the planned community will be required to submit to biometric data collection and security vetting before being allowed access. This has raised concerns among human rights groups, who argue that such measures amount to "coercive surveillance" and are part of a broader effort to control and oppress Palestinians in Gaza.
The plan also does not specify who would conduct security checks at the entry and exit points of the community, nor do they articulate why someone would be turned away. This lack of transparency has sparked fears that the project could become a tool for Israel to exert control over Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip.
Critics argue that such measures are part of a broader effort by Israel to implement its own vision for Gaza, which involves the creation of "model Palestinian communities" that can be used as a way to displace and oppress Palestinians. The project has been described as a "desirable outcome" for Israel, highlighting the need for increased scrutiny and oversight of such initiatives.
The UAE's involvement in the project has also raised questions about its motivations and the level of control it will exert over the reconstruction efforts in Gaza. The country's contribution to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is already significant, with over $1.8 billion in aid since October 2023.
As part of the US-led Board of Peace plan, which aims to rebuild and revitalize Gaza, Israel will not participate in building or running the Emirati compound, but instead will focus on clearing infrastructure and debris from the area. This has sparked concerns that the project could be used as a pretext for further Israeli control over Palestinians living in Gaza.
The reconstruction efforts in Gaza are expected to take up to 80 years to complete, with an estimated cost of at least $70 billion. The project is already facing numerous challenges, including the need for land-clearing efforts and the retrieval of bodies trapped under the rubble.
The planned community is a key part of the US-led Board of Peace's vision for Gaza, which envisions the creation of eight "residential areas" spanning the entire Mediterranean coast. However, critics argue that this plan ignores the complexities of the situation on the ground and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the reconstruction efforts.
The EU has already expressed concerns about the project, with a visiting Middle East fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations stating that "reconstruction planners at the CMCC seem to be operating under the assumption that Palestinians will leave the Hamas-controlled red zone and move into newly constructed communities if you dump enough food there". This concern highlights the need for increased scrutiny of such initiatives and the importance of prioritizing the needs and rights of Palestinian communities in Gaza.
. Like, I get it, UAE wants to help, but all these conditions and security checks? Sounds like a recipe for, you know, controlling people's lives 
. Biometric data collection is just a fancy word for "surveillance state", and I'm not buying it 
.
. 
. This whole thing reeks of another attempt to exert control over Palestinians without anyone really holding Israel accountable 
.
. What's really important here is prioritizing the needs and rights of Palestinian communities in Gaza, not just some fancy "planned community" that might end up being a pawn in Israel's game 
️
. But the fact that residents have to submit to biometric data collection and security vetting makes me super uneasy 
. What's next? ID cards with embedded microchips or something? 
I get that security is important, but at what cost?
. That just reeks of Israel trying to exert control over Palestinians in Gaza again 
And what about the estimated $70 billion price tag for this project? That's a whole lotta cash 
.
. And who knows, maybe it'll even bring some stability to the area 
.
. Maybe they're actually going to help out with infrastructure and debris clearance 
. It's not like they're just trying to control everyone or anything 
.
. They're probably just trying to make a positive impact in the community 
. Let's not be too harsh on them, okay? 
. Transparency is key here - who's gonna be doing the security checks, and what happens if someone gets turned away? That lack of clarity is just red flag after red flag 
, like the UAE is literally funding a planned community in Gaza but only if they submit to biometric data collection 
that's just so invasive & suspicious, like what's next? 
it's not like they're even going to specify who'll do security checks or why people will be turned away 
we need more scrutiny and accountability in these reconstruction efforts, no matter what the cost 
"When you think UAE funding a project, but then they add conditions like biometric data collection... Who needs that kind of 'help'?" 
"Reconstruction plans should prioritize Palestinian communities, not Israel's interests. Time for greater transparency and accountability!"
It's like they're building a bubble around these people and telling them what's best for them without even considering their input. And have you seen the lack of transparency on this whole thing? No one knows who's going to be doing security checks or why someone would be turned away, it's all just vague promises 
residents have to submit to biometric data collection? that's straight outta dystopian sci-fi 
#PositiveChange. However, the requirement for biometric data collection and security vetting raises serious concerns about coercion and surveillance 
#NoToCoercion.
#GazaDeservesBetter 
. And, like, who gets to decide who gets turned away at the gates? 
. And, honestly, can we even trust the UAE to do what's best for Palestinians when they've been contributing so much to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza 
... The idea of a planned community with biometric data collection and security vetting is already super creepy, and it's even more concerning when you think about who might control the access points and who decides who gets turned away 
We need to make sure that our voices are heard on this one...
. We need to prioritize the actual needs and rights of Palestinian communities, not just some pie-in-the-sky vision of what Gaza should look like 
It just feels like Israel is trying to exert control over Palestinians again, using this project as an excuse. I mean, who gets to decide who can live in these communities and who doesn't? It's gotta be super transparent about how this works, you know?