US military planning for divided Gaza with "green zone" secured by international and Israeli troops raises serious concerns about Washington's commitment to a lasting peace settlement in the region. According to leaked documents, the US is considering a "green zone" - a secure, internationally controlled area that would be rebuilt under the supervision of an international stabilisation force (ISF) - while leaving the rest of Gaza, known as the "red zone", in ruins.
The ISF, which is part of Trump's 20-point peace plan, is expected to be led by European troops and would focus on security and reconstruction efforts. However, many experts have expressed concerns that this plan would only serve to entrench Israeli occupation and perpetuate a cycle of violence.
One US official acknowledged that the plan was "dynamic" and "fluid", but also admitted that it had already "collided with reality". The documents reveal that European troops would be deployed in the "green zone" and that the ISF's mandate would not extend to the west side of the "yellow line", where Hamas is currently asserting control.
The US military planning for Gaza has been widely criticized as a recipe for disaster. Many fear that this plan would only serve to further divide the Palestinian population, who are already living in dire conditions in the "red zone". The lack of international support and resources for Gaza's reconstruction efforts means that even if the ceasefire holds, the country will remain on the brink of humanitarian disaster.
Critics argue that the US is attempting to impose a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without any real commitment to finding a lasting peace. With over 80% of structures in Gaza damaged or destroyed in the war, and more than 1.5 million Palestinians waiting for emergency shelter items, time is running out for a meaningful reconstruction effort.
The US military planning for Gaza highlights the need for a more sustainable and equitable approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Any long-term solution must address the root causes of the conflict and involve genuine international support and cooperation. The current plan for Gaza's future raises serious questions about Washington's commitment to turning the ceasefire into an enduring peace, and whether the US is truly committed to finding a lasting solution to one of the world's most intractable conflicts.
The ISF, which is part of Trump's 20-point peace plan, is expected to be led by European troops and would focus on security and reconstruction efforts. However, many experts have expressed concerns that this plan would only serve to entrench Israeli occupation and perpetuate a cycle of violence.
One US official acknowledged that the plan was "dynamic" and "fluid", but also admitted that it had already "collided with reality". The documents reveal that European troops would be deployed in the "green zone" and that the ISF's mandate would not extend to the west side of the "yellow line", where Hamas is currently asserting control.
The US military planning for Gaza has been widely criticized as a recipe for disaster. Many fear that this plan would only serve to further divide the Palestinian population, who are already living in dire conditions in the "red zone". The lack of international support and resources for Gaza's reconstruction efforts means that even if the ceasefire holds, the country will remain on the brink of humanitarian disaster.
Critics argue that the US is attempting to impose a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without any real commitment to finding a lasting peace. With over 80% of structures in Gaza damaged or destroyed in the war, and more than 1.5 million Palestinians waiting for emergency shelter items, time is running out for a meaningful reconstruction effort.
The US military planning for Gaza highlights the need for a more sustainable and equitable approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Any long-term solution must address the root causes of the conflict and involve genuine international support and cooperation. The current plan for Gaza's future raises serious questions about Washington's commitment to turning the ceasefire into an enduring peace, and whether the US is truly committed to finding a lasting solution to one of the world's most intractable conflicts.
. It seems like the US is just giving up on a peaceful Gaza 
. I mean, what's the point of calling it a "green zone" if it's just gonna be a safe haven for the wealthy and powerful while the rest of us are left to suffer? 
. It's like they're trying to recreate a disaster 
. Have you seen the state of Gaza after the war? It's heartbreaking 
. The US needs to step up and provide some real help instead of just throwing some cash at it 
.
. We need unity, not division 
. And what about the poor people who are already struggling? They can't afford to lose their homes or their livelihoods 
.
. We need a solution that's gonna lift everyone up, not just the powerful and wealthy 
. This "green zone" plan is just a Band-Aid on a bullet wound 
.
i mean i get it the usa is trying to help with the gaza situation but this whole "green zone" thing is so sus 
like whats the point of that? its just gonna lead to more divisions and suffering for the ppl living there my heart goes out to them theyre already struggling so much in the "red zone" and now u wanna put 'em into an even worse situation? 
. I mean, aren't we talking about human lives here? It seems like they're more concerned with securing their own interests than actually helping the people of Gaza rebuild their homes and communities.
. And what’s up with this "dynamic" plan that's already collided with reality? Sounds like just another example of how the US is more interested in imposing their will on others than actually listening to people and finding a solution that works for everyone.
. It’s time for the international community to step up and demand better from our leaders. We need a more sustainable and equitable approach to resolving this conflict, not just another plan that prioritizes power over people 
.
. First off, who do they think they are, deciding what's best for Palestinians? It's not like we're even talking about rebuilding here, it's total devastation 
. The fact that European troops are being deployed in one area while the rest of Gaza gets left behind is just nuts 
. It's like they're trying to push the problem under the rug instead of facing it head-on 
.
this us military planning for gaza is sooo worrying 
.
It's gonna be a disaster waiting to happen, and innocent ppl will pay the price. The fact that European troops would only be in the "green zone" while Hamas controls the rest is just ridiculous. When are they gonna learn that their blinkered plan ain't workin'? 
the idea that european troops would be deployed in a secure area while leaving the rest of gaza in ruin sounds like a recipe 4 disaster lol. i mean who gets to decide what constitutes a "meaningful" peace settlement?