US reviewing 'every' green card from 19 countries after capital attack

US Launches Sweeping Review of Green Card Holders From High-Risk Countries Amid US Capitol Attack Fears.

In a dramatic move, the Trump administration has announced that it is reviewing the immigration status of every permanent resident from Afghanistan and 18 other countries suspected to be linked to terrorism. The review comes amid growing concerns over security threats after Wednesday's attack on National Guard troops in Washington D.C., which left several people dead and others injured.

According to officials, a suspect with ties to Afghan forces is believed to have carried out the shooting. The individual, who is 29 years old, had been granted asylum, not permanent residency, just months ago through a group that resettled Afghans in the US following the 2021 Taliban takeover.

US Customs and Immigration Services director Joseph Edlow has issued an executive order directing a "full-scale" re-examination of every Green Card holder from countries deemed "of Identified Concern." While the specific countries were not listed, officials pointed to President Trump's June executive order, which classified 19 nations as high-risk. These countries include Afghanistan, along with several others in Africa and the Middle East.

The order imposed strict travel restrictions on nationals from these countries, effectively banning nearly all entry into the US. However, some temporary work visas from certain of these countries are still allowed. The review is seen as an effort to bolster national security in light of increasing concerns over terrorism.
 
This latest development has me intrigued ๐Ÿค”. I think it's a classic case of "security through hysteria" โ€“ the government is using this high-profile attack as a pretext to launch a sweeping review of Green Card holders from countries deemed high-risk, which might be an overreaction given the limited evidence linking these countries to terrorism.

From a sociological perspective, I worry that this move could lead to increased stigmatization and xenophobia towards immigrants from these countries, who may already face significant barriers in integrating into American society. It's essential to consider the root causes of terrorism and address them through policies that promote inclusive community building and social cohesion rather than relying on restrictive immigration measures.

Moreover, I'd like to see more transparency around the criteria used to determine which individuals will be subject to this review โ€“ are they based solely on nationality or also take into account individual circumstances? How will this review impact the lives of innocent families who have lived in the US for years, contributing to their communities and paying taxes?

The fact that some temporary work visas from these countries are still allowed raises questions about the consistency of the administration's approach. It feels like a knee-jerk reaction rather than a thoughtful, evidence-based policy response.

Overall, I'm cautiously optimistic that this review will ultimately lead to more effective national security measures, but for now, I think it's essential to have a nuanced discussion about the potential consequences and consider alternative approaches that prioritize community building and social inclusion. ๐Ÿ‘€
 
OMG, I'm literally freaking out about this news ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿšจ! Like, I get that national security is important and all, but reviewing every single green card holder from these high-risk countries? That's just super invasive and creepy ๐Ÿ˜ณ. And what even is the point of reviewing asylum seekers who got here just months ago? They're already living in the country, paying taxes and contributing to society ๐Ÿค‘. It feels like they're being held to a different standard than everyone else.

I'm also worried about how this is gonna affect people's lives ๐Ÿค•. Imagine having your green card revoked because of something you didn't even do ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ. What if you have family members who are in these countries and can't visit them? It's just too much uncertainty ๐Ÿ’”.

And I'm curious, what exactly does the Trump admin think is gonna happen if they review all these people's immigration status? Are they gonna catch some huge terrorism threat? ๐Ÿค” I don't get it.
 
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ Just wondering if this move is gonna make a difference ๐Ÿค”? I mean, we've had our fair share of terrorists in the US too ๐ŸŒŽ. Are they gonna deport all Afghan refugees who have been living here for years? It's just so unfair ๐Ÿ’” #JusticeForRefugees #ImmigrationReform #NationalSecurityMatters
 
This whole thing makes me wonder, what does it mean for us when we put a label on someone's 'identified concern'? Are we defining people by their nationality or their actions? It feels like we're trying to contain the threat, but isn't that just pushing it underground? I think about all the Afghan refugees who came here seeking asylum, only to be scrutinized because of their country of origin. Can't we see the humanity in them? It's like we're treating people like objects, rather than individuals with stories and struggles. ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ’ญ
 
omg this is getting so scary for ppl who actually did nothing wrong ๐Ÿค• i feel bad 4 afghan folks just trying 2 make a life here, only 2 be told they might b denied citizenship ๐Ÿค can we just focus on building bridges instead of walls? ๐Ÿ˜”
 
omg this is getting crazy ๐Ÿคฏ i remember when trump was still president and he's always going on about keeping us safe but now it's getting so extreme... like, what even is a high-risk country? is it based on actual info or just his opinion? ๐Ÿ™„ anyway, this review of green card holders from these countries might be a good thing i guess? we do need to prioritize national security but also not discriminate against people from certain countries... like, isn't that how we ended up with refugees in the first place? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ and btw, what's the deal with asylum vs permanent residency? can someone explain it to me again? ๐Ÿ˜•
 
I don't think this is a good idea ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‘Ž. I mean, we're talking about people who have already been vetted and cleared to live in the US. It's like, what's next? Reviewing the status of all our friends from abroad just because of some scary news ๐Ÿ“ฐ. I get it, national security is important, but let's not forget that most immigrants are good people just trying to make a living and contribute to society ๐Ÿ’ผ. And what about those who have been living here for years, paying taxes, and being model citizens? Do we really need to scrutinize them so closely? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ I think we should focus on finding the real culprits behind these attacks instead of targeting innocent people ๐Ÿšซ. Let's try to be more understanding and welcoming, not just when it's convenient ๐Ÿ˜Š.
 
๐Ÿšจ bad news alert ๐Ÿšจ just heard that the US is reviewing green card holders from high-risk countries like Afghanistan... like, what's next? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ we're already living in a world where one attack on the capitol gets everyone paranoid about our own citizens being terrorists ๐Ÿ’” and now they wanna review every single person's status? it's like they think the solution to terrorism is to turn our own people against each other ๐Ÿคฏ and meanwhile, these countries are still getting strict travel restrictions... what's the point of that? just another way to create more tension and mistrust between nations ๐ŸŒŽ
 
๐Ÿค” this is super worrying for ppl living in those countries, imagine having their entire life scrutinized just because of where they're from ๐ŸŒŽ its like, we get it, safety first, but do we have to profile people from specific countries? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ also what's the real goal here, are they gonna deport these ppl or just keep an eye on them ๐Ÿ‘€
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ so the US is gonna review everyone's green card holder status just because someone attacked a bunch of people in DC... how does that even work? Like, we're supposed to believe that all Afghans are terrorists now? ๐Ÿ™„ I mean, come on. 18 countries, huh? That sounds like a legit reason to start suspecting everyone of being a threat... until you realize it's just because Trump had an executive order about it. ๐Ÿค” And what's with the asylum guy who carried out the attack? Like, didn't we give him a chance at a new life or something? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ now he gets to go back to being a suspect instead... nice job, US government. ๐Ÿ‘Ž
 
Man... this whole thing got me thinking about how we define "security" and who gets to decide what's safe for our borders ๐Ÿค”. I mean, what's the threshold for being deemed a threat? Is it based on nationality alone or are they looking at individual profiles too? It's like, what's the difference between someone who's radicalized vs. someone who just happens to have family ties in a country we consider high-risk?

And have you ever thought about how this kind of review can be perceived by people from those countries? I mean, it feels like a blanket statement of mistrust, rather than an individual assessment of risk ๐Ÿšซ. It's all about creating this binary between "us" and "them", which is just so... humanizing ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

What if we took a step back and asked ourselves what really drives these decisions? Is it fear or is it actually about finding solutions to real problems? I'm not saying that security shouldn't be a concern, but do we need to start targeting entire groups of people just because they might be from somewhere with a questionable reputation? That's some pretty heavy stuff to throw around ๐Ÿ’ฅ.
 
Back
Top