US Plans to Take Over Greenland Sparks Fears of NATO's Demise
Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets in Copenhagen, Denmark's capital, yesterday as a vocal minority showed their opposition to US President Donald Trump's push to take control of Greenland. The autonomous territory has been under Danish rule since 1953, but Washington's intentions have sparked intense debate about its future.
The NATO alliance, which both Denmark and the US are part of, would be severely shaken if the US were to invade or exert significant pressure on a member state. According to Guntram Wolff, a senior fellow at Bruegel think tank, this could essentially mean the end of the bloc as it is known today. "If the United States were to invade Greenland, that would have severe implications for the entire alliance," Wolff warned.
The protests in Copenhagen demonstrate that not everyone shares the US government's vision for the island's future. But with the fate of Greenland hanging in the balance, many are left wondering what this means for the stability and cohesion of the NATO alliance – an institution that has been a cornerstone of international security for decades.
Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets in Copenhagen, Denmark's capital, yesterday as a vocal minority showed their opposition to US President Donald Trump's push to take control of Greenland. The autonomous territory has been under Danish rule since 1953, but Washington's intentions have sparked intense debate about its future.
The NATO alliance, which both Denmark and the US are part of, would be severely shaken if the US were to invade or exert significant pressure on a member state. According to Guntram Wolff, a senior fellow at Bruegel think tank, this could essentially mean the end of the bloc as it is known today. "If the United States were to invade Greenland, that would have severe implications for the entire alliance," Wolff warned.
The protests in Copenhagen demonstrate that not everyone shares the US government's vision for the island's future. But with the fate of Greenland hanging in the balance, many are left wondering what this means for the stability and cohesion of the NATO alliance – an institution that has been a cornerstone of international security for decades.
meanwhile us taking control of greenland is just another example of the us being its usual imperialistic self 
i mean who needs nato when u got a big ol' us military to handle things? and btw if china is so worried about nato, maybe they shd focus on their own mess instead of trying 2 take down others 
I'm not saying Denmark is going down without a fight (or a plate of smørrebrød), but if the US tries to exert pressure on them, it's gonna be like trying to get my little sister to eat veggies – ain't happening! 
. NATO's demise? More like Denmark's got some major backbone going on! 
I'm really worried about the implications of the US trying to take control of Greenland. It's not just about the autonomy of the territory, but also about the future of NATO as we know it 
. If the US is willing to exert its power like this, what's next? Are they going to start invading other NATO member states too? 
The fact that tens of thousands of protesters showed up in Copenhagen just goes to show how divided public opinion is on this issue 
. I think it's time for the international community to step in and make sure that no one country can just dictate its will over another, especially when it comes to something as important as global security 
.
just saw those protests in Copenhagen and i'm literally shook 
US trying to take over greenland is like, totally out of line 
nato is already super fragile, doesn't need some us intervention to make it collapse 
think about all the countries that would be affected if they took action against a member state... it's like, who's gonna protect them then? 
also can someone pls explain why i saw more pics of protesters holding flags than actual protests tho 
. If the US can just dictate terms to Denmark without any real consequences, that sends a pretty bad message about how the alliance operates.
. And it highlights just how fragile international relations can be when diplomacy fails or when one side gets too big for its britches.
.
.
. If the US does decide to take control of Greenland, it's not like Denmark would lose all its sovereignty 
. They'd still have a say in the country's governance and decision-making processes. And let's be real, NATO's been around for ages 
– it can handle a little change 
, but I get that not everyone is on board with this plan 
. After all, NATO's been a key player in international security for decades 
. It's not like they're going to disappear into thin air 
.
. And now the NATO alliance is gonna be all shook up? 
That's just a recipe for disaster, if you ask me. I don't get why we need all these military bases and whatnot... can't we just have diplomacy and all that jazz? 
Anyway, kudos to the Danes for standing up for their territory – they're totally right to be all upset about this 
.
.
! Like, I get it, Denmark wants to keep control, but is the US really gonna just go in there and take it by force? 
. It's like, we're talking about a global superpower here, but they can't even have a conversation without causing drama 
.
! This is exactly why we need more diplomacy and less belligerent posturing 
.
. I'm keeping an eye on this one 
. I mean, what's next? takin control of NATO? that's just crazy talk 
... can't we just have world peace and stability instead of all these conflicts? 
. I'm no expert, but it seems like Denmark has been pretty good about being a part of NATO without any major issues, you know? And now this? It's all kinda sudden and scary