Warner Bros. Heads Say 'Joker: Folie à Deux' Was Good, You Guys Are Just Mean

Warner Bros. Heavy Hitters Insist 'Joker 2' Was Ahead of Its Time, Despite Fan Backlash

In a bold statement, Warner Bros. CEO Pamela Abdy and chairperson Michael De Luca have come to the defense of Todd Phillips' highly divisive sequel, Joker: Folie à Deux. The film, which received widespread criticism from fans and critics alike, was met with lukewarm reception at the box office. However, Abdy and De Luca insist that the film's boldness and originality were ahead of its time.

"It was really revisionist," De Luca said in an interview with The Wrap. "It may be that it was too revisionist for a global mainstream audience, but I thought Todd and his screenwriting partner Scott Silver did the thing that most people making sequels don’t do, which is they decided to not repeat themselves."

Abdy echoed De Luca's sentiments, adding, "I really liked the movie. I still do." The Warner Bros. bosses seemed to be brushing off the criticisms of the film, with Abdy stating that she didn't let the negative reception affect her opinion of the movie.

On the other hand, Joaquin Phoenix's co-star Lady Gaga was more candid about the film's reception. "People just sometimes don’t like some things," she told Elle in 2025. "It’s that simple. And I think to be an artist, you have to be willing for people to sometimes not like it."

Not everyone shares this sentiment, however. Death Stranding developer and noted cinephile Hideo Kojima believes that Joker: Folie à Deux will grow on audiences over time. "Over the next 10 or 20 years, this film’s reputation will likely change along with the permeation of hero movies to come," he wrote.

Quentin Tarantino also came to Phillips' defense in a 2024 interview with The Wrap. "The Joker directed the movie," Tarantino said. "He is the Joker." Tarantino praised Phillips for his bold and subversive approach to the film, which he believes was a middle finger to execs and comic book fans.

In contrast, io9 reviewer stood firm in their criticism of the film. The reviewer wrote, "It just sucked."

As it stands, Warner Bros.' stance on Folie à Deux is at odds with that of the general public. However, it's clear that Abdy and De Luca are committed to defending the film's artistic vision. Whether or not the film will ultimately grow on audiences remains to be seen, but one thing is certain – Todd Phillips' bold approach has sparked a heated debate about what makes a successful sequel.
 
The platform can't handle the truth... 😒 I mean, come on, who needs more criticism when you've got people from Warner Bros defending a film that bombed at the box office? Like, Pamela Abdy and Michael De Luca are just trying to save face here 🙄. Their "it was ahead of its time" nonsense is just that - nonsense 💁‍♀️. Joaquin Phoenix's co-star Lady Gaga seems like the only one being genuine about it all, saying people don't always like things and that being an artist means taking risks 🤷‍♂️.

And what's with all these Hollywood big shots chiming in on each other? Hideo Kojima thinks it'll grow on audiences over time, but I'm not holding my breath 🙅‍♂️. And Quentin Tarantino's just being his usual obnoxious self, praising Phillips for his "bold and subversive approach" like that's a good thing 😒. Meanwhile, io9 reviewer is just keeping it real with their criticism... 🤔

Anyway, I guess what I'm saying is that the film might've been ahead of its time in terms of being confusing and pretentious, but that doesn't mean it was good 💭. Can we get some more nuanced discussion on this? Or am I stuck here arguing with people who just want to defend their buddies 🤷‍♂️?
 
I don't get why ppl have such strong feelings about it 🤷‍♂️. I mean, it's just a movie, rite? 😂 I think it's cool that Warner Bros is standin' by their artist tho 👏. Like, what if ppl didn't like Star Wars or Lord of the Rings when they first came out? Would we still watch 'em today? 🤔
 
idk why ppl are so harsh on jokermovie 2 lol it was prob ahead of its time 🤷‍♂️ like, ppl r always sayin dont mess with the classics but sometimes u gotta take some risks right? i mean todd phillips did somethin diff with this sequel and that's whats makin ppl talk about it. not everyone will get it tho, but thats what makes art interesting, duh 🎨
 
I'm still reeling from that Joker 2 controversy 🤯. I mean, some people are saying it was ahead of its time, but honestly, I think it's just a case of creators being really, really confident in their vision 💁‍♂️. Newsflash: sometimes that confidence can come across as arrogance or even just plain confusing 🤔.

I love Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga are both amazing actors, but I don't think anyone is going to forget the overwhelming feeling of dread that came with watching this movie 😳. For me, it's like they took a beloved character and turned him into some sort of anti-hero nightmare 😱.

And don't even get me started on the post-credits scene 🤯... yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around it too 🤯.

All in all, I think Hideo Kojima is probably right that this film will grow on people over time, but for now, I'll stick with my initial reaction: it's a mess 😂. Can we get a re-watch and some closure? 👀
 
im not surprised tbh, these studios always wanna push boundaries & take risks with their movies 🤑 the problem is that sometimes they forget its fans who actually care about the franchise 💔 but hey, to each their own, if warch Bros thinks joker 2 was ahead of its time, i guess thats all that matters 💁‍♀️
 
It's crazy how people can have such differing opinions on something as seemingly straightforward as a movie 🤔. I mean, it's easy to dismiss someone else's taste in film, but what does that really say about us? Are we just afraid of being proven wrong or do we genuinely want the artist to fail?

And let's talk about the concept of 'ahead of its time' - is that a cop-out for lack of commercial appeal? I think it's an interesting dynamic where we're more willing to praise someone for taking risks when they don't quite pay off, but not so much when they do. It makes me wonder what other films or works of art are being unfairly maligned because they didn't fit into our preconceived notions.

Meanwhile, the fact that some people (like Hideo Kojima) genuinely believe a film's reputation will change over time is a testament to how subjective our experiences and perceptions can be 🤯. It's also refreshing to see Quentin Tarantino defend Todd Phillips' vision - it shows us that even in a world where opinions are divided, there's still room for appreciation of artistic courage.

Ultimately, I think the real question here is: what does 'success' mean in the context of art? Is it about critical acclaim or commercial success? Or can we appreciate something on its own terms without needing validation from others?
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda with Warner Bros. on this one 🤔. I mean, Joker: Folie à Deux was definitely... something. But at the same time, I can see why people didn't connect with it as much. Todd Phillips took some huge risks with that film and they paid off in a weird way? It's like he made the movie he wanted to make without worrying about what others would think 🎥.

That being said, 10-20 years from now, maybe this film will be seen as some kinda trailblazer or whatever. I can see how Hideo Kojima is right in saying that people's tastes change over time 😊. And Lady Gaga's quote is pretty fair - not everyone's gonna like every movie, and artists gotta take risks to make something new.

But at the same time, I gotta respect Tarantino's opinion on this 🙌. He knows his stuff and Todd Phillips did something bold with that film. It's just... it's not for everybody, you know? And io9's review was pretty spot on - "it just sucked" is a fair assessment 😂.

Anyway, kudos to Warner Bros. for standing by their artistic vision 🎉. It's not always easy to make a sequel that people will love, but I guess they did something right... or at least, they're trying 🤷‍♂️
 
the whole "it was ahead of its time" argument feels like a cop-out 🤷‍♂️. the fact that abdy and de luca are saying this, but joaquin phoenix's response is more down-to-earth ("people just don’t like some things"), makes me wonder if they're just trying to save face 💁‍♀️. meanwhile, hideo kojima's prediction about the film's reputation changing over time isn't entirely implausible 🤔. it'll be interesting to see how this debate plays out in the next 10-20 years 👀
 
I'm still trying to get my head around why people loved this Joker 2 movie so much 🤔. To me, it just felt like a bunch of weird stuff thrown together and calling it art. I mean, Joaquin Phoenix's performance was solid, but that's about where it ended for me. And Gaga's character? Just didn't work for me at all 😐. But hey, I guess that's the beauty of art – what one person hates, another person will love 💁‍♀️.

And honestly, I don't get why Hideo Kojima thinks this movie will grow on people over time 🤷‍♂️. To me, it just feels like more of the same old Joker nonsense 😒. Tarantino's defense of Phillips is a bit baffling too – wasn't he part of the whole problem with the film? 🙄. And what about all those critics who said it "sucked"? 🤣 I kinda feel for them.

It's interesting to see how people are divided on this one, though. Maybe I'll just stick to watching my Death Stranding games instead 😂.
 
🤔 Drawn diagram of a split-screen with two sides:

Left side: 🚫 Red circle with an X symbol
Fans' reactions to Joker 2 were overwhelmingly negative, with many feeling that the film was too weird and uncomfortable.

Right side: ⭐️ Yellow starburst
But, what if Abdy and De Luca are right? Maybe Folie à Deux is a cult classic in the making, ahead of its time like De Luca said. Phillips took a bold risk by making a sequel that's not just a retread of the first film, but an exploration of the Joker's psyche.

The thing is, people don't always understand what they're missing out on until it's too late... or in this case, 10-20 years later when Kojima says its rep will change. 🤷‍♂️
 
Back
Top