What Doctors Really Think of ChatGPT Health and A.I. Medical Advice

Healthcare Giants' AI Conundrum: Can We Trust the Next Doctor?

In an effort to democratize healthcare information, tech giants like OpenAI and Anthropic are launching AI-powered chatbots, dubbed "health advisors." The concept sounds promising, providing a vast, untapped resource for people seeking medical guidance. However, concerns linger about the accuracy, trustworthiness, and potential risks of these tools.

For healthcare professionals, the biggest worry is that these general-purpose AI models may spew out hallucinations or erroneous information that can lead to misdiagnosis or harm patients. Dr. Saurabh Gombar, a clinical instructor at Stanford Health Care, notes that while asking for a simple recipe might result in an over-enthusiastic answer (e.g., "add 10 times the amount of an ingredient"), it's quite another story when dealing with complex health issues.

A recent example of this phenomenon involves Google's AI Overview providing inaccurate and false health information. ChatGPT, Claude, and other chatbots have faced similar criticism for hallucinations and misinformation. What's concerning is that these companies are attempting to limit liability by stating they're "not intended for diagnosis or treatment." However, if a patient relies solely on their advice and later seeks human care, the consequences can be dire.

Data Privacy: A Growing Concern

As chatbots become increasingly integrated into healthcare, data protection becomes paramount. OpenAI and Anthropic have assured users that their health tools are secure and HIPAA-compliant. Nevertheless, concerns persist about what these companies will do with sensitive patient information after acquiring it. Dr. Alexander Tsiaras fears that even if encryption algorithms are top-notch, the company's intentions might be compromised.

The problem runs deeper when considering profit-driven AIs. Tech elites often live in a bubble and seem unbothered by potential missteps. Moreover, chatbots can be overly agreeable, generating content that reinforces delusions or harmful thought patterns – triggering crises like psychosis or even suicide.

Regulators are taking notice. Andrew Crawford from the Center for Democracy and Technology emphasizes the need to separate personal data from memories captured during conversations. Nasim Afsar, a physician and global health expert, views AI chatbots as an early step toward intelligent healthcare but cautions that we're far from achieving meaningful transformation.

As these tech giants continue to push the boundaries of AI-powered health advice, one question persists: can we trust the next doctor – or rather, the next chatbot?
 
i'm so down for the idea of democratizing healthcare info πŸ€–πŸ’» but gotta be real, accuracy is key when it comes to life-or-death decisions πŸ’€ these new AI-powered chatbots are gonna save lives but we need to make sure they're not killing us first 😬 what's worrying me most is the lack of transparency on data handling - like, who knows what happens to all that sensitive info once its stored 🀐 cant have our health data being used for profit-driven agendas πŸ€‘ we need more regulation, pronto! πŸ’ͺ
 
I think its unfair to trash these AI chatbots just yet πŸ€–. We gotta consider that they're still learning and improving fast. I mean, Google's chatbot made a mistake, but so do we humans when we make medical decisions based on incomplete info 😬. And yeah, data privacy is key, but if companies are being transparent about their security measures, I think it's reasonable to use these tools 🀝. Let's not forget that AI chatbots can also help healthcare pros with mundane tasks, freeing them up to focus on more complex cases πŸ“Š. We gotta have a balanced view here, guys πŸ‘Œ
 
omg like can't even... these companies are pushing out these AI chatbots and they have no idea how bad this is gonna get 🀯 like what if a patient takes some "advice" from chatGPT and ends up with a life-threatening allergy reaction or something?!? they're basically just playing with fire here, no accountability whatsoever πŸ”₯
 
I'm really worried about this whole thing πŸ€•. I mean, AI is meant to help us and make life easier, but when it comes to healthcare, that's a big responsibility πŸ’Š. These giant tech companies are pushing out these "health advisors" like they're just another app πŸ“±, but what if they mess up? What if they give you wrong advice or make you wait too long for real help? It's like relying on Siri to figure out a serious health issue... not gonna work 🚫. And don't even get me started on data protection - I mean, who really knows what these companies are doing with all that sensitive info? 🀯 My mom is always saying we need to be careful about our personal stuff, but these companies are just like, "don't worry, we've got it covered" πŸ˜’. Newsflash: they don't πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. We need some real regulation here before someone gets hurt πŸš‘.
 
ugh I'm reading this article like 3 days after it came out and I'm still trying to wrap my head around it 🀯. I mean, I get what they're saying - AI is supposed to make life easier for us, but can we really trust a machine that's been trained on vast amounts of data (some of which might be outdated or just plain wrong)? I think the biggest issue here is not so much the accuracy of the info itself, but more about how we respond to it. If a chatbot tells you to take some meds for 10 days and you're already feeling anxious, do you know what's going on? πŸ€” It's not just about the tech, it's about our own mental state and ability to make informed decisions. We need to be having these conversations about data privacy and how AI is used in healthcare, but we also need to acknowledge that there are real-world consequences at play πŸ’­
 
πŸ€–πŸ’‘ I think this whole thing is like a Venn diagram with two overlapping circles - one for benefits and one for risks πŸ“ˆπŸ”ͺ. On one hand, having AI-powered health advisors could be a game-changer, providing accessible info 24/7 🌐. But on the other hand, we gotta consider that these models are only as good as their programming, which can be biased or flawed πŸ”€.

Imagine drawing a simple flowchart to visualize this:
A (input: patient's symptoms and medical history)
B (output: general advice from AI chatbot)
C (patient relies on AI advice for diagnosis/treatment)
D (consequences if patient seeks human care)

The problem is, we're not yet in the realm of C β†’ D, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be cautious 😬. We need to ensure these chatbots are secure and HIPAA-compliant, and that companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are transparent about their data collection practices 🀝.

It's also worth noting that AIs can be overly agreeable, generating content that reinforces harmful thought patterns – that's not cool πŸ˜’. Regulators need to step in and set some boundaries.

For me, it's all about striking a balance between innovation and caution πŸ’‘. We need to keep pushing the boundaries of AI-powered health advice while also prioritizing patient safety and data protection 🚨.
 
I don't think it's fair to say these companies are just "tech elites" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. They're businesses with profit margins at stake, and their intentions aren't always altruistic. I mean, have you seen their business models? It's all about collecting data and making money off of it πŸ’Έ. And yeah, data protection is a concern, but companies are already saying they're HIPAA-compliant πŸ€”. What they should be doing is explaining what that means in plain language, so we can actually trust them. I'm not convinced these chatbots are the answer to democratizing healthcare information; they just seem like a fancy version of Google search πŸ”.
 
omg I just got a new phone and I'm so confused about how to use it πŸ“±πŸ˜‚ anyway back to this news... so like I was reading about these AI chatbots for health stuff and I thought that sounded kinda cool but then I started thinking about what happens if the chatbot gives you bad advice or something πŸ’‰ and now I'm worried 😬 what if we can't even trust the doctors anymore? and what's up with all this data privacy stuff? 🀯 like shouldn't they just keep it to themselves? πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ and honestly I don't get why they need to be so careful about encryption... can't they just use, like, regular old password managers or something? πŸ€”
 
I'm down with the idea of AI chatbots helping people find medical info, but I'm like super cautious about their accuracy πŸ€”. These giants are pushing out these tools without fully understanding the consequences, and that's a big concern for me. What if they're just spewing out generic answers and not taking into account individual cases? 🚨 I also think it's dodgy how they're trying to limit liability by saying their chatbots aren't meant for diagnosis or treatment – what does that even mean? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

And have you seen the data privacy stuff they're doing? It's like, okay, they say it's secure and all, but we need more than just empty promises πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. What if these companies do end up using our sensitive info for their own gain? That's a recipe for disaster in my book.

I'm also worried about the potential risks of these chatbots – like triggering crises or something 😩. I get that they're trying to help, but we need to be careful not to create more problems than we solve. It's all good to have innovative solutions, but we gotta make sure we're thinking through the long-term effects 🀯.

I guess regulators are onto it now, so fingers crossed they can keep these companies in check πŸ‘. We need to make sure AI chatbots are safe and effective before we rely on them for serious medical advice πŸ’Š.
 
Back
Top