AI is like a double-edged sword 
. On one hand, it can help YouTube weed out spammy or low-quality vids 
. But on the other hand, it's also super easy for fake history channels or AI-generated content to spread misinformation 
. creators need to be careful and not get caught in the false positive trap 
. I think YouTube needs to do a better job of explaining how its AI tools work and what the criteria are for getting demonetized or banned 
. Transparency is key! 
. On one hand, it can help YouTube weed out spammy or low-quality vids . But on the other hand, it's also super easy for fake history channels or AI-generated content to spread misinformation . creators need to be careful and not get caught in the false positive trap . I think YouTube needs to do a better job of explaining how its AI tools work and what the criteria are for getting demonetized or banned . Transparency is key! 
Anyway, I think Neal Mohan's got a solid plan here - AI can be super effective in spotting weirdos... err, I mean, suspicious content. What's key is making sure those algorithms aren't biased against human creators who put effort into their vids. Can we get more transparent about how these mods work? 
But seriously, using AI to moderate content is a good idea - it's just gotta be done right or else we'll end up with even more fake vids spreading misinformation. And can we please get some transparency on how the AI is working? Like, what are the criteria for what gets flagged as low-effort content? 
. and don't even get me started on youtube shorts... if you're gonna let ai-generated vids have an advantage, then why not just make a separate section for them? that way creators who actually put effort into their vids aren't getting overshadowed by robots making vids in 30 seconds 
