Zillow removes climate risk scores after agents complain about sales

Zillow Pulls Climate Risk Scores from Listings After Real Estate Agents Express Discontent

Just one year after launching a climate risk scoring program, Zillow has dropped its feature, which provided climate risk scores for over 1 million listings, following complaints from real estate agents. The data was sourced from First Street, a climate risk startup that initially assessed the risks and shared them with Zillow.

The move comes after agents expressed concerns that the data was misleading and potentially led to lost sales. In response, Zillow has now linked to First Street's original assessment, rather than displaying the scores themselves. This change means that listings will no longer display climate risk labels, which some considered would put "thoughts in people’s minds" about properties.

The California Regional Multiple Listing Service (CRMLS) is pleased with Zillow's decision, citing the potential impact on perceived property desirability. CRMLS CEO Art Carter stated that displaying flood probabilities could have a significant effect on how desirable a property seems.

However, not everyone is happy with the change. First Street, which provided the original climate risk scores, has expressed disappointment, arguing that the risks don't simply disappear when the data is shared post-purchase. The company's spokesperson, Matthew Eby, pointed out that consumers still need to consider these risks as liabilities.

Carter also questioned the validity of First Street's data, suggesting that areas with low historical flood risk are unlikely to experience flooding in the near future. First Street countered by stating that its models are built on transparent science and continuously validated against real-world outcomes.

The decision highlights the complexities surrounding climate risk assessments and their application in real estate. With over 80% of prospective buyers considering climate risks when shopping for a new home, it's clear that this issue is far from resolved.
 
yeah i think its kinda funny that agents were all bent outta shape about not having those labels on listings 🀣... like they'd rather buyers be clueless about the environmental impacts of their dream home. but seriously tho, its cool that zillow's making a change to link to first street's original data, even if it means no more flood probs labels. its all about being transparent and educated, you know?
 
I think Zillow made a big mistake by pulling out its climate risk scores πŸ€”. I mean, we're living in times where sustainability and eco-friendliness are literally changing the way we buy homes. It's not just about the price tag anymore, folks want to know if their future home is gonna be underwater or not 🌊.

The real estate agents are just trying to protect themselves from being seen as 'uncool' or 'out of touch', but I think it's actually a missed opportunity for them to educate buyers on climate risks πŸ˜…. And now, those scores are gone and you can't even find 'em online πŸ“ˆ. It's all about transparency and giving people the facts, not hiding behind marketing spin 🌟.

I hope First Street keeps pushing for better climate risk assessments, this isn't over πŸ’ͺ
 
I think Zillow made the right call πŸ€”... well, sorta πŸ˜…. The whole thing just got too messy. I mean, real estate agents are right to be concerned about misleadin' potential buyers, but at the same time, First Street's data is legit and it's not like they're just makin' up stuff πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ.

It's all about how you present the info πŸ“Š. Linkin' to the original assessment is a good compromise βš–οΈ. And I get what CRMLS CEO Art Carter said, but First Street ain't goin' away πŸ’ͺ. They're stickin' by their science and that's somethin' to be respected πŸ”¬.

It's all about findin' that balance between bein' helpful and not scaring people off πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. Climate risk scores are here to stay, so it's good we're havin' these conversations πŸ’¬.
 
πŸ€” just think about it, if some agents are really worried about getting lost sales because they don't like the way Zillow displays climate risk scores, isn't that kinda ironic? πŸ€‘ I mean, real estate is all about selling properties and making people happy, but now we gotta worry about what "thoughts" might put in a buyer's mind when they look at those scores? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It's like, shouldn't we be focusing on the actual risks and not just the labels we slap on 'em? πŸ’‘
 
I dont get why Zillow has to drop its climate risk scores thingy... πŸ€” it was kinda helpful for people buying homes and stuff. Now they just gonna link to some other site instead? πŸ“ˆ I think the real estate agents were being super whiny about it, tbh πŸ™„. First Street is all like "but the risks dont go away" and im like yeah no kidding πŸ˜‚. Its a big deal for people buying homes because its not just about the price, there are climate changes to consider... 🌑️
 
πŸ€” think zillow made the right call lol they got roasted by agents and crmls who was gonna lose sales from those climate labels anyway. first street should've seen this coming tho 🚨 at least they still linked to their original assessment, that's something πŸ‘
 
I'm so frustrated with Zillow right now 🀯! I mean, who wouldn't want to know if the house they're buying might flood?! It's not just about aesthetics, it's about having all the facts when making such a big decision.

But at the same time, I get why agents were upset - it's one thing to have data, but another to see those scores on a listing. Can't we just have access to that info without being shamed for buying a "problematic" property? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

And what really gets me is that First Street's data was validated by real-world outcomes, yet people are still questioning its validity? Like, if it's not perfect, so what?! It's still better than knowing nothing and risking a disaster! πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€” So I'm kinda surprised Zillow pulled the climate risk scores thing. I get where the agents were coming from, but at the same time, isn't the goal to inform buyers about potential risks? 🌑️ It feels like a trade-off between transparency and not scaring people away with 'flood probabilities' or whatever.

And yeah, I can see why CRMLS would be happy about it, but honestly, wouldn't it be better for sellers to know if their property's at risk of flooding too? πŸ πŸ’¦ It seems like a pretty big thing that just gets passed on without much consideration.

I'm not sure what the deal is with First Street's data being questioned, though... isn't science kinda supposed to be objective and all that? πŸ˜•
 
πŸ€” I mean, can you believe this? Zillow just dropped its climate risk scores after the agents freaked out 🚨. It's actually kinda reasonable, though - those scores could've been super misleading and ruined some sales πŸ’Έ. But what's up with First Street not being happy about it? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ They're all like "Hey, these risks don't just disappear" πŸŒͺ️.

Anyway, stats-wise, did you know that 82% of homebuyers are now super concerned about climate change when shopping for a new pad? πŸ“Š That's wild. And it makes sense - who wouldn't want to avoid flooding or wildfires in their dream home? πŸ’¦

The California Regional Multiple Listing Service (CRMLS) is totally on board with this decision, though. They said those flood labels could've actually hurt property desirability 🀯. But First Street's all like "No way, we're scientists!" πŸ”¬.

Here's a fun fact: according to the National Association of Realtors, 45% of homebuyers are willing to pay more for a home that's been certified as energy-efficient πŸ’‘. Maybe Zillow should reconsider climate risk scores and just offer some eco-friendly tips instead? 🌱

Anyway, I guess this whole thing is just a reminder that climate change affects real estate in crazy ways 🀯. We need to keep having these conversations! πŸ’¬
 
I'm so confused about this Zillow thing... πŸ€” I get why they wanna keep some kinda info on climate risk, but at the same time, agents are worried it might hurt sales? Like, isn't that a good thing to know when buying a house? It's gotta be better than not knowing, right? 🌎 And what's up with First Street and CRMLS disagreeing about the data being valid? I guess some people just wanna protect their interests as real estate agents. But at the end of the day, shouldn't we all be thinking about the planet when it comes to buying a house? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
omg i cant believe zillow dropped this feature 🀯! i mean idk about the agents complaining but its not like they're gonna lose any actual money from homeowners selling their properties... it just seems like real estate agents dont wanna deal with the extra info πŸ€‘ and now climate risk is being kinda watered down? 🌑️
 
Umm... so Zillow stopped sharing those climate risk scores on listings cuz some agents were like "meh" about 'em? I don't get it, isn't the point of knowing how likely a property is to flood gonna help buyers make informed decisions? πŸ€” But if the agents didn't want to deal with that info, then shouldn't Zillow just, like, leave it out? And now they're linking to First Street's original data... what's the diff? 😐 And isn't First Street kinda right about consumers still having to worry about these risks even after buying a place? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
just saw that zillow dropped its climate risk scores πŸ€” ... think they made the right call tho 😊. agents were complaining about it being misleading and potentially scaring off buyers πŸ’Έ. not sure how useful those labels were anyway 🏠. gotta prioritize clarity over anxiety, ya know? πŸ‘
 
Back
Top