Federal Judge Questions Pentagon's Attempt to Punish Sen. Mark Kelly Over Speech
A federal judge expressed skepticism over the Pentagon's efforts to downgrade the pay and rank of Democratic Senator Mark Kelly (AZ) for publicly urging service members not to follow unlawful military orders. The action comes after Kelly, a retired Navy captain, sued Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in January claiming he was targeted by "extreme rhetoric and punitive retribution" from the Trump administration.
Kelly received a censure letter from Hegseth alleging that his public criticism undermined the chain of command and counseled disobedience among military ranks. The Pentagon later announced it would re-evaluate Kelly's retirement pay grade.
In a 45-minute court hearing, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon expressed concern over the Justice Department's arguments that speech limitations typically imposed on active-duty officers should be extended to include retired service members like Kelly.
"That's never been done," Leon told the Justice Department attorney. "You're asking me to do something that the Supreme Court has never done. That's a bit of a stretch, is it not?"
Kelly's lawyers argue that the Pentagon's actions are an unlawful attempt to stifle his First Amendment right to free speech, which could also chill the speech of every retired veteran in the country.
The judge hopes to rule on the issue by February 11, giving the parties time to appeal. Kelly believes he has the Constitution on his side and expressed appreciation for the judge's quick consideration of the case.
A federal judge expressed skepticism over the Pentagon's efforts to downgrade the pay and rank of Democratic Senator Mark Kelly (AZ) for publicly urging service members not to follow unlawful military orders. The action comes after Kelly, a retired Navy captain, sued Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in January claiming he was targeted by "extreme rhetoric and punitive retribution" from the Trump administration.
Kelly received a censure letter from Hegseth alleging that his public criticism undermined the chain of command and counseled disobedience among military ranks. The Pentagon later announced it would re-evaluate Kelly's retirement pay grade.
In a 45-minute court hearing, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon expressed concern over the Justice Department's arguments that speech limitations typically imposed on active-duty officers should be extended to include retired service members like Kelly.
"That's never been done," Leon told the Justice Department attorney. "You're asking me to do something that the Supreme Court has never done. That's a bit of a stretch, is it not?"
Kelly's lawyers argue that the Pentagon's actions are an unlawful attempt to stifle his First Amendment right to free speech, which could also chill the speech of every retired veteran in the country.
The judge hopes to rule on the issue by February 11, giving the parties time to appeal. Kelly believes he has the Constitution on his side and expressed appreciation for the judge's quick consideration of the case.