Mayor Johnson, Gov. Pritzker push back on Trump threat to halt funding for Chicago, other sanctuary cities

Illinois Leaders Fire Back at Trump's Funding Threats for Chicago and Other Sanctuary Cities

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Governor JB Pritzker have joined forces to push back against President Donald Trump's threat to cut off federal funding for the city by the end of February, citing concerns that the move would be "blatantly unconstitutional and immoral."

The latest development comes as part of a larger trend in which Trump has repeatedly targeted sanctuary cities like Chicago with his administration. Trump claims the decision is aimed at preventing crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, but critics argue it's an attempt to punish cities that don't comply with federal immigration policies.

Chicago, along with New York City and Los Angeles, limits cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and provides stronger protections for immigrants who entered the country without permission. The city has been sued over similar funding threats in the past, most notably by the Trump administration in July.

The decision to target sanctuary cities comes as part of a broader effort to punish local governments that are seen as being too lenient on undocumented immigrants. The Justice Department published a list last year of 36 states, cities, and counties deemed to be "sanctuary jurisdictions." The majority of those places have Democratic leadership.

Governor Pritzker called Trump's threat an attempt to "treat American taxpayers like pawns" in his response. He vowed that Illinois would continue fighting for the funds it is owed, having previously beaten the administration in court.

Mayor Johnson echoed similar sentiments, stating that Chicago will not back down from a fight and that the city is prepared for another lawsuit. The Mayor warned Trump to take the matter to court directly, saying "To the president, our message is simple: We'll see you in court."

The dispute centers on a provision of federal law allowing states to withhold funding if they are deemed sanctuary cities. However, many experts argue that this provision has not been clearly defined and that the decision should be left up to individual state governors.

For now, Chicagoans can rest easy knowing that their city will stand firm against Trump's threat. As Governor Pritzker said in a post on X, "We've beaten the administration in court before – and we're not afraid to keep doing so."
 
πŸ€” I'm telling you, this is all about control. The feds want to dictate how cities run, but what's really going on? They're trying to chip away at states' rights, one funding threat at a time. And let's be real, the whole "sanctuary city" thing is just a smokescreen for their real agenda. They don't care about crime rates or immigration; they care about lining their own pockets and getting what they want. πŸ€‘ The fact that Gov Pritzker and Mayor Johnson are fighting back says more than we know – there's definitely some hidden motives at play here... πŸ‘€
 
Ugh, I'm like, totally annoyed by this whole thing πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ... I mean, come on Trump, can't you just make up your mind? First it's one thing, then another, and now you're threatening to cut off funding for Chicago because the Mayor is trying to protect people who came here seeking a better life? That's not even sanctuary cities anymore, that's just good old-fashioned American values πŸ’–. And don't even get me started on Governor Pritzker's "treat American taxpayers like pawns" comment - what a total misinterpretation πŸ€”... The guy was actually talking about how Trump is trying to strong-arm the state into giving up its rights, which is totally not okay. Anyway, I'm glad Chicago is standing firm against this nonsense πŸ’ͺ.
 
🀬 Trump thinks he's got some leverage over cities just 'cause they won't play ball with his immigration nonsense? Newsflash, dude: Illinois is still gonna get that funding πŸ€‘. I mean, what's the real goal here? To punish cities for not complying with federal policies? Give me a break πŸ™„. It's just another power move from someone who thinks he's above the law... again πŸ˜’. And honestly, can't we all just focus on getting some actual progress done instead of playing politics over funding? πŸ’Έ Chicago knows what's up and they're not gonna back down 🀯. Bring it on, court πŸ‘Š
 
πŸš¨πŸ’” Just saw that Illinois is getting hit with a funding threat from Trump again... like, what's next? 🀯 This is just great, because who doesn't love having their city taken hostage by the president over immigration policy? πŸ™„ And Chicago has already lost court battles over this stuff before... it's like they're stuck in some kind of never-ending nightmare. 😩 The mayor and governor are trying to be all tough and whatnot, but let's be real, we've seen plenty of cities get bullied by the feds before and come out on top with lawsuits. Fingers crossed Chicago can do the same... but I'm not holding my breath πŸ€•.
 
πŸ™ŒπŸ’ͺ Illinois is totally on it! 🀝 Mayor Johnson and Governor Pritzker are giving President Trump the ol' middle finger πŸ‘Š and refusing to back down from the funding threat. It's like, can't they see that targeting sanctuary cities is just plain petty? πŸ˜’ Chicago has done nothing wrong by providing a safe haven for immigrants who just want a chance at a better life 🌎. The fact that Trump thinks he can strong-arm them into compliance is laughable 🀣.

And let's be real, this is just another example of Trump trying to bully local governments into toeing the party line 🚫. It's like, no thanks, Prez! πŸ˜’ Illinois will keep fighting for its funding and will come out on top πŸ’β€β™€οΈ.

As for the provision in federal law that allows states to withhold funding... yeah, good luck with that πŸ™„. Most experts agree that it's vague as heck and should be left up to individual state governors. So, President Trump can just keep on tweeting about it πŸ’¬... meanwhile, Illinois will be over here, living its best life 🌈.
 
omg I'm like totally confused why trump is still going after sanctuary cities like chicago 🀯 he just can't accept that they have the right to make their own decisions about immigration. it's wild how governors and mayors are fighting back against this, they're like "nope, we won't let you bully us" πŸ’ͺ I remember when obama was president and he did the same thing, but at least he didn't threaten to cut off funding πŸ˜’ governor pritzker and mayor johnson are totally on point, it's time for trump to take this to court if he wants to keep trying to punish them 🀝
 
lololol i was just watching this crazy bird feeder tutorial on YouTube πŸ¦πŸ˜‚ and it got me thinking... have you ever tried making your own bird feeders? it's super easy and fun! πŸŒΏπŸ’š i swear, the most relaxing thing is watching those birds flit around in their new homes 🐀🏠 anyway, back to politics... or not 😜
 
I'm getting really frustrated with this whole sanctuary cities thing 🀯... Like, can't they just leave us alone? We're not hurting anyone by giving a little extra protection to people who don't have papers πŸ“. It's just common sense. And now they're threatening our funding? That's just ridiculous πŸ’Έ. I mean, what's next? Cutting off food stamps for people who can't pay their bills? It's all just so... so... πŸ™„. Can't we just focus on solving real problems instead of playing politics?
 
I gotta say, this whole thing is lowkey wild... 🀯 Trump thinks he can just threaten funding for cities that don't play ball with his immigration policies? Like, newsflash, Mr. President: you can't dictate how other states and cities govern themselves! πŸ˜’ It's kinda like when Tony Soprano was all bent outta shape about the Feds poking their nose into his business in The Sopranos... πŸ“Ί Anyway, Chicago and Illinois are like "peace out, we got this" - they're prepared to take on Trump's tantrums in court if that's what it takes! πŸ’β€β™€οΈπŸ‘Š
 
I'm loving this drama between Chicago and the Trump admin πŸ€£πŸ“ I mean, who does he think he is? Threatening funding over states that don't want to get all up in federal business? It's like he's trying to play politics with taxpayer money πŸ’ΈπŸ‘€ Illinois leaders are totally on it though! Governor Pritzker and Mayor Johnson are giving him the ol' stink-eye πŸ‘Š and I'm here for it πŸ™Œ The city is gonna fight this all the way to the Supreme Court if they have to πŸ”₯πŸ’ͺ Anyway, let's just say I'll be keeping a close eye on how this one plays out... can't wait to see what happens next!
 
aww man, this is getting old... like, what's next? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ trump's all about flexing his muscles and making lives hard for people who just wanna live. chicagoans are strong and they won't back down from a fight πŸ’ͺ. it's not just about the funding, it's about being treated with dignity and respect πŸ™. governor pritzker and mayor johnson are speaking truth to power and standing up for what's right πŸ’―. we got this, chicago! πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
 
πŸ€” I'm not convinced that the federal government has actually cut off funding for any sanctuary city before... πŸ“Š Can someone please provide some evidence of a previous lawsuit or court case where Trump's admin went through with their threat? This whole thing sounds like another classic example of "you can't keep us down" from Illinois politicians... πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm low-key impressed by the combo of Brandon Johnson & JB Pritzker goin' against trump's funding threats 🀝. Chicago's all about that immigrant life, you feel? It's not just about the funding, it's about the values they're fightin' for πŸ’ͺ. Trump thinks he can bully 'em into submission? Nah, the city's got this πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. And can we talk about how Pritzker is callin' out trump like a boss πŸ—£οΈ? It's time someone stood up to that dude πŸ˜’.
 
omg, this is getting old 🀯... like seriously, can't trump just chill? πŸ™„ he's always trying to play hardball with cities that don't wanna cooperate on immigration stuff. but honestly, who wouldn't want to help those in need? 🀝 and what's up with this funding thing, it's like he thinks we're just gonna roll over because he says so πŸ˜‚... newsflash, trump: chicago isn't going down without a fight πŸ’ͺ.

and can we talk about how illogical this all is? πŸ€” if the feds really want to punish cities that aren't cooperating on immigration, why not just create some clear rules and enforcement mechanisms instead of trying to strong-arm them into submission? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ it's like they think americans are gonna just sit around waiting for their tax dollars to be withheld because of some fancy-schmancy provision in a law that nobody really understands πŸ˜….

anyway, kudos to governor pritzker and mayoral jones for standing up to trump's threats πŸ™Œ. let's hope they don't have to go through another lawsuit, but if they do, i'll be rooting for them all the way πŸ’ͺ🏽
 
I'm loving how the mayor and governor are all about taking this head-on πŸ™Œ! I mean, come on, Trump thinks he can just threaten them with funding cuts? Like, please do your research, dude πŸ˜‚. It's like, if that provision in federal law is so clear-cut, why haven't we seen any other states or cities get taken down for being sanctuary jurisdictions before? πŸ€”. And Governor Pritzker calling out the administration for treating taxpayers like pawns? πŸ’ΈπŸ‘Š. That's some major sass right there! 😎 I'm also feeling pretty optimistic about Chicago's chances in court πŸ“š. Those lawyers are gonna knock it outta the park, and Trump will be left looking like a big ol' baby 🀑. This whole thing is just fuel for me to believe that good always wins out in the end πŸ’«!
 
can't believe trump thinks he can strong-arm cities into enforcing immigration laws like some kinda dictator 🀣 anyway, it's clear he's just trying to get under peoples' skin with these funding threats. like, newsflash, pres, you don't dictate policy through fiscal punishment - that's not how the system works πŸ€‘ and honestly, i think these sanctuary city laws are a great idea - they show we care about ppl who need help & aren't afraid to take on the man πŸ‘Š
 
🀝 I'm kinda surprised Trump is still trying to strong-arm cities into playing by his rules πŸ™„. It's like he thinks the mayor and governor of Chicago are just going to roll over and let him dictate how they run their city πŸ˜’. Newsflash, Prez: you can't just cut funding and expect everyone to cave 🚫. The fact that Chicago is suing him again shows that they're not intimidated πŸ’ͺ. It's also pretty rich that he's trying to punish cities for being "too lenient" on undocumented immigrants – it's like he thinks they're just going to magically make all the problems disappear πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. Anyway, kudos to Mayor Johnson and Governor Pritzker for standing up for their city and its residents πŸ‘
 
Trump thinks he can strong-arm cities with his funding threats πŸ€‘, but newsflash, dude - Illinois isn't having it! The governor and mayor are totally on point here, saying that this move is "blatantly unconstitutional and immoral". Like, if anyone knows about morality, it's the people of Chicago. And let's be real, who needs some admin trying to dictate what cities do? Not me, that's for sure πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. We should be supporting our local governments in making decisions that work best for their communities, not some arbitrary "sanctuary city" label. Illinois is all about protecting its residents and standing up for what's right - and I'm here for it πŸ’ͺ
 
I think it's crazy how Trump is trying to punish cities for being friendly to immigrants... like what's the big deal? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I mean, he says it's about preventing crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, but that just doesn't add up. And those states and cities on his list are usually run by Democrats, so it feels like a revenge thing. Anyway, I'm glad Mayor Johnson is standing up for Chicago - the city has always been a melting pot and it should be able to decide how it wants to treat its own people. And good luck to them in court, they've already proven they can take on the feds! πŸ’ͺ
 
Back
Top