"Sexist" Sky Sports TikTok Channel Axed After Just Three Days: "We Didn't Get It Right"
In a shocking move, Sky Sports has abruptly shut down its new female-focused TikTok channel, Halo, after just three days of operation. The broadcaster announced that it would be stopping all activity on the account, citing that they had not successfully executed their intended goal.
The channel was launched with high hopes to create an inclusive platform for women to enjoy sports content and share their perspectives. However, many users quickly took to social media to express their disappointment and outrage at what they perceived as a "patronising" and "sexist" approach.
Critics argued that the channel's posts were not only lacking in substance but also perpetuated stereotypes about women's sports. One user called it one of the worst concepts they had ever seen, stating that creating a dumbed-down sports channel for women was "unbelievably sexist".
The backlash against Halo was swift and widespread, with many social media users sharing their own experiences of being objectified or stereotyped in sports commentary. A prominent platform covering women's football expressed its frustrations, saying it couldn't imagine this is what women's sports fans want.
While some argue that Sky Sports should have listened to the concerns and adjusted its approach, others believe that the channel was never a viable option in the first place. As one user pointed out, women don't need separate content spaces; they deserve equal representation in existing platforms.
Sky Sports has since deleted all but two of Halo's posts and issued a statement apologizing for not executing their vision correctly. The broadcaster remains committed to creating inclusive spaces for its fans, but it seems that this particular experiment was a costly mistake.
In a shocking move, Sky Sports has abruptly shut down its new female-focused TikTok channel, Halo, after just three days of operation. The broadcaster announced that it would be stopping all activity on the account, citing that they had not successfully executed their intended goal.
The channel was launched with high hopes to create an inclusive platform for women to enjoy sports content and share their perspectives. However, many users quickly took to social media to express their disappointment and outrage at what they perceived as a "patronising" and "sexist" approach.
Critics argued that the channel's posts were not only lacking in substance but also perpetuated stereotypes about women's sports. One user called it one of the worst concepts they had ever seen, stating that creating a dumbed-down sports channel for women was "unbelievably sexist".
The backlash against Halo was swift and widespread, with many social media users sharing their own experiences of being objectified or stereotyped in sports commentary. A prominent platform covering women's football expressed its frustrations, saying it couldn't imagine this is what women's sports fans want.
While some argue that Sky Sports should have listened to the concerns and adjusted its approach, others believe that the channel was never a viable option in the first place. As one user pointed out, women don't need separate content spaces; they deserve equal representation in existing platforms.
Sky Sports has since deleted all but two of Halo's posts and issued a statement apologizing for not executing their vision correctly. The broadcaster remains committed to creating inclusive spaces for its fans, but it seems that this particular experiment was a costly mistake.