Detroit City Councilwoman Mary Waters has proposed a law aimed at preventing law enforcement officers in the city from wearing masks or facial coverings that conceal their identities while carrying out their duties. The proposal, dubbed the "Alex Pretti Detroit No Masks Ordinance," is intended to increase transparency and accountability among law enforcement.
Waters cited the recent fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a citizen who was filming immigration enforcement in Minneapolis, as the inspiration for her proposal. Pretti's death sparked widespread outrage, and Waters wants to honor his memory by ensuring that officers are identifiable while enforcing the law.
Under the proposed ordinance, any local, state, or federal law enforcement personnel would be prohibited from wearing masks or other facial coverings during their duties in Detroit. The goal is to enable the public to identify individuals engaging in law enforcement activities within the city, which is seen as essential for preventing abuse of power and promoting trust.
The proposal comes amid growing national criticism of federal immigration agents' practice of wearing masks during enforcement actions. Critics argue that this tactic makes it difficult for the public to verify who is conducting arrests and hold officers accountable.
While Detroit would not be the first city to ban law enforcement from wearing masks, Waters' ordinance is part of a larger trend of cities taking action against what they see as a threat to transparency and accountability in policing.
Los Angeles County and Philadelphia have recently approved similar ordinances requiring law enforcement officers to show their faces and display identifying information while performing duties. Denver city council members have proposed an ordinance that would prohibit officers from concealing their identities during interrogations, detentions, or arrests.
However, experts warn that local efforts to regulate federal immigration agents may face constitutional challenges under the Supremacy Clause. As a result, it remains unclear whether local mask bans would effectively prevent federal agents from acting with impunity.
Waters' ordinance must be approved by the Detroit City Council before it can take effect. If adopted, the city law department would determine how violations are enforced, ensuring that law enforcement in Detroit is transparent and accountable to its citizens.
Waters cited the recent fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a citizen who was filming immigration enforcement in Minneapolis, as the inspiration for her proposal. Pretti's death sparked widespread outrage, and Waters wants to honor his memory by ensuring that officers are identifiable while enforcing the law.
Under the proposed ordinance, any local, state, or federal law enforcement personnel would be prohibited from wearing masks or other facial coverings during their duties in Detroit. The goal is to enable the public to identify individuals engaging in law enforcement activities within the city, which is seen as essential for preventing abuse of power and promoting trust.
The proposal comes amid growing national criticism of federal immigration agents' practice of wearing masks during enforcement actions. Critics argue that this tactic makes it difficult for the public to verify who is conducting arrests and hold officers accountable.
While Detroit would not be the first city to ban law enforcement from wearing masks, Waters' ordinance is part of a larger trend of cities taking action against what they see as a threat to transparency and accountability in policing.
Los Angeles County and Philadelphia have recently approved similar ordinances requiring law enforcement officers to show their faces and display identifying information while performing duties. Denver city council members have proposed an ordinance that would prohibit officers from concealing their identities during interrogations, detentions, or arrests.
However, experts warn that local efforts to regulate federal immigration agents may face constitutional challenges under the Supremacy Clause. As a result, it remains unclear whether local mask bans would effectively prevent federal agents from acting with impunity.
Waters' ordinance must be approved by the Detroit City Council before it can take effect. If adopted, the city law department would determine how violations are enforced, ensuring that law enforcement in Detroit is transparent and accountable to its citizens.
I gotta say, this whole mask thing is kinda weird. Like, what's the point of hiding your face when you're supposed to be serving and protecting? But at the same time, I get where Waters is coming from - transparency is key, right? It's like, if you're doing something wrong, people should be able to see who's behind it.
. And what happens when they're hiding their faces and still breaking the law? It just seems like more of the same old game 
.
. If Detroit passes this ordinance, are they really gonna shut it down just because it's not federal law? It feels like they'd rather have our backs than just try to cover their own behinds 
.
. Maybe instead of banning masks altogether, we should focus on building trust with communities through community policing and de-escalation training 
. Just a thought 
, especially after all those incidents of police brutality where the officers were trying to cover their tracks. It's not like they're doing anything wrong by wearing masks, but it's just common sense that we should be able to know who's behind the badge 
. I mean, what if a cop is actually corrupt or hiding something? You'd never know unless they're required to show their face 
. And let's be real, transparency is key in law enforcement 
.
It's all about trust and making sure our law enforcement officers are doing what they're supposed to do - serve and protect us. And hey, it's not like this is going to make them more aggressive or anything (though that's a valid concern too). I think it's actually a great idea to have some accountability in place, especially with all the high-profile cases of misconduct happening everywhere. Plus, think about how much easier it'll be for our communities to report any suspicious activity if they can see who's doing what! 
. I mean, who wants a cop in a mask filming people? Sounds like some kind of conspiracy theory movie 
. But at the same time, it's hard not to see where Mary Waters is coming from. I guess the idea of being able to identify cops on camera is a good one 
. But hey, if it makes people feel safer or more comfortable around law enforcement, then I'm all for it 
. It's about time we see some transparency in our police departments 
. But we gotta be careful not to overstep our bounds, you know? 
We don't wanna create more problems than we solve 
.
. I just hope it doesn't lead to any more unnecessary confrontations between cops and citizens 
.
It seems like a good idea on paper, but I don't know... might be some major hurdles down the line. Still, it's an interesting conversation starter, and I'm all for lookin' out for each other in the community 
... but at the same time, i feel like we're kinda forcing a solution without fully thinking through the implications 
... federal agents wear masks 4 security reasons, and now detroit wants 2 take away that option? 
I get where Waters is comin' from with Alex Pretti and all, but can't we just have a little more nuance on this one? It's like, what if there's some crazy situation where someone's gotta hide their face for real reasons? 
I get where Mary Waters is coming from, but I think it's kinda extreme 
I mean, what if someone's just trying to keep their identity private for whatever reason? Like, maybe they're a whistleblower or something? 
Shouldn't we be giving people the freedom to choose how much info they want to share? I'm not saying law enforcement needs to be more transparent, but like...balance, right? 
now detroit might be the first city 2 ban masks on cops 
but what about all the other cities like la & philly who r already doin the same thing? 
! IF WE CAN SEE WHO'S DOING THE ENFORCEMENT, WE CAN BE SURE THEY'RE NOT JUST MAKING UP STUFF LIKE SOMETHING OUT OF A MOVIE 
.
And then there's the whole "increasing transparency and accountability" thing... don't we already have laws in place for that? 
I'm literally hyped for this ordinance to pass!! Mary Waters is literally a hero for advocating for transparency & accountability in policing 
I mean, think about it, if you can see the cop's face, you know they're not trying to hide anything 
!
. Seriously though, if we want to hold our law enforcement officers accountable, we need to know who they are and what they're doing. Waters' proposal might not be perfect, but it's a start.
. We deserve better, folks!
? It sounds like some fancy lawyer stuff, but honestly, can't we just focus on making sure our cops are doing their jobs without, you know, killing innocent people or harassing minority groups? 