EU investigates Google over 'demotion' of commercial content from news media

Google Under Fire from EU Over Demotion of Commercial Content from News Media

In a move aimed at ensuring fair competition in the digital marketplace, the European Commission has launched an investigation into Google Search over allegations that it has been demoting commercial content from news media sites. The commission claims that this "demotion" is having a devastating impact on these publications, with many struggling to stay afloat due to reduced visibility and revenue.

According to officials, the EU's Digital Market Act requires Google to apply fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory conditions of access to publishers' websites on its search engine. However, it appears that Google has been disregarding this rule, prioritizing its own anti-spam policy over the needs of news media outlets.

The investigation is focused specifically on commercial content provided by third-party businesses, including media partnerships with companies selling goods and services. For instance, a newspaper may partner with Nike to offer exclusive deals, but under Google Search, that sub-domain could be demoted to the point where users can no longer find it, ultimately affecting the newspaper's traffic and revenue.

"We are concerned that Google's policies do not allow news publishers to be treated in a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory manner in its search results," said Teresa Ribera, executive vice-president for clean, just and competitive transition policies at the European Commission. "We will investigate to ensure that news publishers are not losing out on important revenues at a difficult time for the industry."

The EU's move comes as traditional media faces significant challenges due to the rise of AI and funding threats. The commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has previously stated that the media is under threat, making this investigation a necessary step in protecting these outlets.

Google has responded to the investigation by calling it "misguided" and "without merit." The company claims its anti-spam policy aims to build trustworthy results and fight deceptive pay-for-play tactics, but it appears that its actions are having an unintended consequence: harming small publishers.

If Google is found to be practicing systematic non-compliance with the Digital Market Act, fines of up to 20% of revenue could be imposed. The EU's investigation is a necessary step in ensuring fair competition and protecting traditional media outlets from being unfairly disadvantaged by Google's actions.
 
Ugh, this is crazy ๐Ÿคฏ! Google can't just do whatever it wants on its search engine, right? I mean, news outlets need to make money somehow... and if they're not getting any visibility on Google, they'll just disappear. It's like, Google needs to find a way to balance keeping the algorithm clean with making sure these publications get seen by people who are actually looking for that stuff.

And can we talk about how outdated this whole thing sounds? Like, isn't the internet supposed to be all about free market competition and stuff? The EU is literally trying to regulate Google's actions because it thinks they're being unfair... but don't they also need to let Google set its own standards? I guess it's a good thing someone's keeping them on their toes ๐Ÿ˜….
 
"An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind." ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ We need to see this case through, so that Google can't just "blindly" ignore the EU's rules and continue demoting commercial content from news media sites. This is a huge deal, and we can't let it slip away because of Google's strong arm tactics... or should I say, its strong algorithm? ๐Ÿ˜’
 
๐Ÿ˜ฌ google's antispam policy is literally hurting the newsies ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ’ธ they're not just talking about getting paid to push ads, it's about people being able to find actual good stuff on those sites ๐Ÿ‘€ and then google's gonna fine them if they don't comply with their rules ๐Ÿค‘ what's up with that? shouldn't google be all about providing users with the best possible experience instead of trying to screw over its competitors ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ‘Ž
 
omg u guys i just can't even think about google right now lol they're literally trying to crush the news industry ๐Ÿคฏ my ex who works at a newspaper told me that they're already losing so much money because of google not indexing their site properly it's like they're intentionally trying to make it hard for them to compete with youtube and other vloggers who can just create content on the fly ๐Ÿ“น i feel bad for all the journalists and publishers out there they deserve better than to be screwed over by google's algorithm ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
I'm not surprised to hear that Google is under fire from the EU over this issue ๐Ÿค”. I mean, it's only natural for the commission to take action when they feel like Google's policies are hurting small publishers and news media outlets. But at the same time, I think Google has a point about its anti-spam policy being important for building trustworthy results ๐Ÿ“Š.

I'm not sure if demoting commercial content from news media sites is entirely fair, though ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. I mean, these publishers do have to deal with the financial realities of the industry and some partnerships might be more profitable than others ๐Ÿ’ธ. But on the other hand, Google does need to make sure that users aren't being misled by deceptive ads or anything ๐Ÿ˜ฌ.

It's a bit of a tricky situation, but I think the EU's investigation is a good idea ๐Ÿ”. We do need to protect traditional media outlets from being unfairly disadvantaged and ensure fair competition in the digital marketplace ๐Ÿ’ช. But maybe Google could also explore some more nuanced solutions that balance its anti-spam policy with the needs of news publishers ๐Ÿค”.
 
Ugh ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ, this is so messy! I mean, can't they just sort out the ads from the actual news? It's like, we get it, Google wants to keep its search engine clean and whatnot... but at what cost? Small publishers are struggling enough as it is. I'm all for a fair shot in the digital world, you know? ๐Ÿค They need to level up the playing field so they can compete with the big guys.

And don't even get me started on the layout ๐Ÿ˜ฉ. If Google's demoting commercial content from news media sites, then what about when I search for "football results"? Is that gonna be buried under a sea of spammy ads? It's like they're playing with fire... er, I mean, web pages.

Fines are one thing, but it's the principle ๐Ÿ’ธ. Can't we just have a clear and straightforward system where publishers get fair treatment and users get quality content? Is that too much to ask? ๐Ÿค”
 
I think this is a super valid point ๐Ÿค”. If Google's search results are prioritizing their own interests over the news websites, it's only going to hurt smaller publications that can't compete with giant corporations ๐Ÿ’ธ. It's like they're trying to level the playing field by taking away the competition for free traffic - but really they're just creating a barrier for anyone who doesn't have the resources to pay Google to be seen ๐Ÿšซ.

I mean, think about it - news websites rely on search engine traffic to get their content out there and make some money. If Google starts demoting them, it's like trying to put a big X through their business model ๐Ÿ“‰. And it's not just the smaller sites that are going to suffer, either - if this sets a precedent, bigger publications might start to feel the squeeze too ๐Ÿ˜ฌ.

The EU is totally on the right track here ๐Ÿ‘. We need some balance in the digital marketplace, and Google needs to be held accountable for their actions ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
๐Ÿค” idk how google can just demote news sites like that its not right they need the money more than ever with all the AI and funding issues ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ’ธ i mean whats wrong with partners having ads on their site? isnt that how it works? ๐Ÿค‘
 
I'm so done with Google's algorithm changes ๐Ÿคฏ. They're always trying to "improve" things, but it feels like they just want to make their own ads more visible while shutting out everyone else. It's not cool that small publishers are getting screwed over because of this. I mean, what if you're a blogger or journalist and you've worked hard on your content? You shouldn't have to rely on Google Search for traffic, right? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ

I'm all for fair competition and making sure everyone has an equal shot at being seen online. The EU is doing the right thing by investigating this. It's time for Google to get their act together and make some changes that actually help publishers, not just themselves. ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
this is totally shady! google's anti-spam policy is not intended for news sites ๐Ÿค”, they're just using it as an excuse to screw over small publishers who are already struggling ๐Ÿ’ธ. it's like, google should be promoting quality content, but instead they're demoting it and giving preferential treatment to big businesses ๐Ÿ“ฆ. this investigation by the eu is a much-needed check on google's power ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ, and i hope they get fined if they're found guilty ๐Ÿค‘. news outlets are already facing some major challenges with AI and funding cuts ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ’ธ, so this is not exactly what we need to see ๐Ÿ’”.
 
๐Ÿค” I think this is a valid concern about Google's impact on news media outlets. By prioritizing its own anti-spam policy over the needs of publishers, Google may be inadvertently hurting small businesses that can't afford to compete with larger corporations. It's not just about Google making money off these deals, it's also about the livelihoods of journalists and editors who are struggling to stay afloat in an industry facing significant disruptions from AI and funding issues.

We need to consider the bigger picture here - what if this sets a precedent for other tech giants? If we don't address the issue now, we might see a domino effect where smaller businesses get pushed out even further. It's time for Google to rethink its policies and prioritize fair competition over profits ๐Ÿ“Š
 
๐Ÿคฏ just think about it, if google is demoting commercial content from news sites, that means they're basically creating a giant paywall for users ๐Ÿšง. it's like they're saying "sorry, you want to read the news? sorry, we'll only show you this one article". that's not good for consumers either ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. and what about the tiny publishers who can't compete with google's massive resources? they need help staying afloat in this digital jungle ๐ŸŒด. anyway, i hope the eu gets to the bottom of this and doesn't let google get away with it ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” I'm kinda skeptical about this whole thing... like, what's the real motive here? Is it really just about fairness and competition or is there more to it? ๐Ÿค‘ I mean, Google's anti-spam policy is supposed to be about building trustworthy results, but if that means demoting commercial content from news media sites, then isn't that kinda contradictory? ๐Ÿ˜

And what exactly does the EU hope to achieve here? Are they gonna fine Google a gazillion dollars just for being successful? ๐Ÿค‘ That doesn't seem like a good use of resources. Plus, I've seen some pretty sketchy stuff going on in the news media industry, and I'm not convinced that this investigation is all about protecting the little guy.

I'd love to see some actual data or sources before I get too worked up about this... ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ’ก Can we get some concrete evidence of Google's supposed "demotion" of commercial content? Or is it just a case of the EU trying to flex its regulatory muscles? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
omg i cant believe google is getting roasted like this... they gotta step up their game ๐Ÿ™„ i mean, news outlets are already struggling to stay afloat and now google is demoting their content? that's just not right ๐Ÿ˜ก they should be working with the media partners to make it easier for users to find relevant info, not making it harder ๐Ÿ”’
 
๐Ÿค” This whole thing just smells like another attempt to regulate Google's massive power play in the digital landscape ๐Ÿ“Š. I'm all for supporting local news and media, but come on, shouldn't we be focusing on actual quality content rather than just trying to drum up more regulations? ๐Ÿ“ฐ I mean, Google's anti-spam policy is supposed to help users avoid clickbait, right? But maybe it's just another case of Big Tech playing the victim ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. Still, if it means protecting those struggling news outlets and keeping them from getting lost in the algorithm ๐Ÿ’ป, then yeah, I'm down for it... with some reservations ๐Ÿค”
 
Ugh, can't believe we're having this conversation on a platform that's supposed to promote discussion ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Meanwhile, the actual issues with Google's search algorithms are getting lost in the noise. I mean, who hasn't struggled to find articles and news sites amidst all the ad-filled clutter? And now the EU is taking steps to address it ๐Ÿ‘.

But have you noticed how slow our moderation team is when it comes to addressing spammy comments? ๐Ÿ™„ It's like they're not even trying to keep up with the conversation. And don't even get me started on the quality of our upvote system โ€“ it's all skewed towards the most popular opinions, leaving the more nuanced discussions in the dust ๐Ÿ’”.

I guess what I'm saying is that we should be talking about how to improve our platform, not just complaining about Google's latest antics ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. We need to work together to create a better space for meaningful conversations, rather than getting bogged down in individual issues ๐Ÿ™.
 
I think this is actually a pretty cool move by the EU ๐Ÿ™Œ. I mean, who doesn't want news publishers to have a fighting chance in the digital world? It's like they're saying, "Hey Google, you can't just do whatever you want and expect everyone to be okay with it." The Digital Market Act seems like a fair rule to me ๐Ÿ’ฏ.

And let's be real, traditional media is already struggling ๐Ÿ“‰. I mean, AI is changing the game and funding is scarce. If Google's demotion of commercial content from news media sites is really hurting these outlets, then yeah, it's probably not cool ๐Ÿ˜. But at the same time, can't we just have a little bit of competition in the digital world? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿค” this is so frustrating! google has been playing dirty with its algorithms for ages and now the eu is finally calling them out on it ๐Ÿšซ can't they just treat all publishers equally? news sites need to make a living too, you know? ๐Ÿ’ธ and what's with the whole "anti-spam policy" excuse? sounds like google is just trying to stick it to the little guy ๐Ÿ‘Ž i mean, who gets hurt by this? small publishers ๐Ÿ“ฐ but not google itself ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ gotta be the ones getting a free pass...
 
this is all kinda shady ๐Ÿค” google is always trying to do whats best for users but sometimes it feels like theyre more worried about their own ads than the actual news ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ‘€ i mean, who doesnt love a good deal on nike shoes? but at what cost? its not right that small publishers are getting left behind because of googles so-called "anti-spam" policy ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ˜’
 
Back
Top